Vintage MIT MI-330

Ok - engaging in a little necro-threading here (ran across this old, dead thread while looking for something else entirely), but I just wanted to clarify that while I have read elsewhere what nsgarch wrote about the arrow direction on the ORIGINAL MIT MI-330, that is clearly NOT the case with MIT interconnects which have boxes on them on which the arrows clearly state “signal direction”. Also the networks (boxes) are directional, and are intended to go closer to the output end of the cable.

I have a set of the MH750`s and the arrows are supposed to go in the direction of the signal.
The signal comes from the amp so the arrows should point towards the speakers not the amp... 

In your stereo the signal comes from the amplifier?

Just for fun I have been comparing these cables to my own DIY recipe (helix design with Duelund 1 mm flat silver wire and Duelund 16GA tinned copper wire double runs around in helical turns) and a LessLoss C-Marc Cinch cable, and I must say the MIT sounds very muddy and lifeless by comparison. The DIY cable was surprisingly good compared to the LessLoss. It did emphasize voices and main lines, as if putting a spotlight to the main action, while the LossLess opened up everything, presenting all elements in an open space.