If you don't have a wide sweet spot, are you really an audiophile?


Hi, it’s me, professional audio troll. I’ve been thinking about something as my new home listening room comes together:

The glory of having a wide sweet spot.

We focus far too much on the dentist chair type of listener experience. A sound which is truly superb only in one location. Then we try to optimize everything exactly in that virtual shoebox we keep our heads in. How many of us look for and optimize our listening experience to have a wide sweet spot instead?

I am reminded of listening to the Magico S1 Mk II speakers. While not flawless one thing they do exceptionally well is, in a good room, provide a very good, stable stereo image across almost any reasonable listening location. Revel’s also do this. There’s no sudden feeling of the image clicking when you are exactly equidistant from the two speakers. The image is good and very stable. Even directly in front of one speaker you can still get a sense of what is in the center and opposite sides. You don’t really notice a loss of focus when off axis like you can in so many setups.

Compare and contrast this with the opposite extreme, Sanders' ESL’s, which are OK off axis but when you are sitting in the right spot you suddenly feel like you are wearing headphones. The situation is very binary. You are either in the sweet spot or you are not.

From now on I’m declaring that I’m going all-in on wide-sweet spot listening. Being able to relax on one side of the couch or another, or meander around the house while enjoying great sounding music is a luxury we should all attempt to recreate.
erik_squires
I do know what 'timbre' means in music, but I confess I have absolutely no clue what that word means in the context it's being used here.

Serious question:  could someone explain it in such a way that a normal listener can understand what it means here?  

Thanks.
I do know what ’timbre’ means in music, but I confess I have absolutely no clue what that word means in the context it’s being used here.

Serious question: could someone explain it in such a way that a normal listener can understand what it means here?

Thanks.
Try wiki read it 2 times.... You will at least understand the complexity of the acoustical mathematical modeling of the problem and understand why without acoustic right settings in a room timbre sound perception is degraded...

I'm with Toole and the papers cited here.  I've heard Vandersteen and Thiel and I could not really tell you they were better in any respect which was outstanding compared to other speakers which did not pay attention to perfect phase response.
Post removed 
imaging champions is I believe the quote, you are welcome to build something better and bring the over to Poverty Bay Sound mastering, we use Vandersteens, the amps and 7 mk2. bring the torso along, i assume it likes a nice Pinot. We serve SeaSmoke Ten. of course i have a head transfer function setup, like the Acony recordings, it yields fantastic and frustrating results....

like i said, get off the web and do something.....i will eat crow when you best Vandersteens, but ya best show up with real hardware..not BS