Everyone has speaker preferences,that's why so many are for sale.Nobody buys a speaker they hate.
They buy it, live with it long enough to either appreciate it's strengths and ignore the weaknesses or move on to the next speaker and start the love/hate relationship all over again.
Understandable, I and my friend have gone thru 40 years and hundreds of speakers,mostly cones for my friend, mostly stats for me.
Neither of us has found the perfect speaker in either a stat or a cone.
But for me I would rather live with all the good things that the X does,which for me ,far exceede any of it's weaknesses, which in the old days was mostly the fault of poor quality of the gear driving it.We have advanced a lot.
Every improvement that I've made in front end electronics,either vinyl or digital is very easy to hear.The X is very resolving,not a euphonic smeared rendition of how someone wants their music to sound.The X tells it like it is.Most stats do, that's why I like them.
But I did have to sweat the details that a lot of audiophile/music lovers fail to think are worth the effort, to get them to this state of sound.
Dedicated lines,20 amps to each speaker direct from the panel,upgraded HiFI supreme fuses,upgraded top of the heap IEC, plugs and RCA's from Furutech and some mods to old cheap original Acoustat parts have transformed this speaker.
It is no where close to what they would have sounded back in the day they were made, and especially with most of the gear that people put in front of them back in the mid 70's.
I have compared my sound to a couple of systems that just the pre amp alone,costs more than the sum of all my components, and that pre isn't the most expensive piece of that system.
Yet, the way the Acoustats mesh with their own power amps, and no crossover(which is a big plus) and the large open window(yes there is an ideal sweet spot, but I do most of my listening in it)energizes the whole room with music.
I had the LS3/5A back in the day, they cost me $400.00 new,and we used to compare them to the X's back in the day.
For a fifth of the price they were a very nice speaker back then.
Now used Rogers sell for $2000.00 and upwards, plus you need to spend money for a good power amp, and speaker wires.So the tables have turned.
Even if both share a similar sound, you now have to spend more money to better the sound of an Acoustst X in top shape.
Personally, I like the style of the X but I did beef up the cabinet's walls and made them more inert and weighed them down.
I get sound out and beyond the sides of those walls, if it's on the recording,so I don't think I'm suffering much by using the old/modded enclosure.
And as I said, my speakers are for personal(me) listening, so that sweet spot is just for me.
If I have to I can share the sweet spot on occassion, and yes,off to either side of the sweet spot it is less of an experience, but if you increase the distance by moving the sofa back a few feet, it also widens the sweet spot for a couple more listeners,but still in the centre is the best seat in the house.
I had the 3 panel non X models back in the mid 80's and used the Premier series from Conrad Johnson to drive them.
The sound was decent, but not as coherent as with the captive servo amps.Again, the non powered panels were the same, but they were highly coloured by the transformer interface, amp and speaker wire of the day.
My friend still listens happily to this day to his AcoustatX speakers(modded and with an AtmaSphere MP3 tube pre/phono(his X amps have XLR connectors but aren't really balanced)that he bought new in 1976.
He paid around $1500.00 for them, about what I paid for my Acoustats used a couple of years ago.I did invest in some new upgraded parts, but I'm happy I did.
Compared to how much old Rogers 5A have appreciated,used working X's are now the bargain.
As stated I would have to spend at least 5 to 6 grand to get a nice pair of Ls3/5A with a nice tube amp and speaker wires, so I think I am ahead of the game.
If I would have followed my friend's advice back in 86, and bought a pair of used X's then, I would be way ahead of the game.
I wouldn't have gone round the merry go round of one love/hate releationship after the other.
They buy it, live with it long enough to either appreciate it's strengths and ignore the weaknesses or move on to the next speaker and start the love/hate relationship all over again.
Understandable, I and my friend have gone thru 40 years and hundreds of speakers,mostly cones for my friend, mostly stats for me.
Neither of us has found the perfect speaker in either a stat or a cone.
But for me I would rather live with all the good things that the X does,which for me ,far exceede any of it's weaknesses, which in the old days was mostly the fault of poor quality of the gear driving it.We have advanced a lot.
Every improvement that I've made in front end electronics,either vinyl or digital is very easy to hear.The X is very resolving,not a euphonic smeared rendition of how someone wants their music to sound.The X tells it like it is.Most stats do, that's why I like them.
But I did have to sweat the details that a lot of audiophile/music lovers fail to think are worth the effort, to get them to this state of sound.
Dedicated lines,20 amps to each speaker direct from the panel,upgraded HiFI supreme fuses,upgraded top of the heap IEC, plugs and RCA's from Furutech and some mods to old cheap original Acoustat parts have transformed this speaker.
It is no where close to what they would have sounded back in the day they were made, and especially with most of the gear that people put in front of them back in the mid 70's.
I have compared my sound to a couple of systems that just the pre amp alone,costs more than the sum of all my components, and that pre isn't the most expensive piece of that system.
Yet, the way the Acoustats mesh with their own power amps, and no crossover(which is a big plus) and the large open window(yes there is an ideal sweet spot, but I do most of my listening in it)energizes the whole room with music.
I had the LS3/5A back in the day, they cost me $400.00 new,and we used to compare them to the X's back in the day.
For a fifth of the price they were a very nice speaker back then.
Now used Rogers sell for $2000.00 and upwards, plus you need to spend money for a good power amp, and speaker wires.So the tables have turned.
Even if both share a similar sound, you now have to spend more money to better the sound of an Acoustst X in top shape.
Personally, I like the style of the X but I did beef up the cabinet's walls and made them more inert and weighed them down.
I get sound out and beyond the sides of those walls, if it's on the recording,so I don't think I'm suffering much by using the old/modded enclosure.
And as I said, my speakers are for personal(me) listening, so that sweet spot is just for me.
If I have to I can share the sweet spot on occassion, and yes,off to either side of the sweet spot it is less of an experience, but if you increase the distance by moving the sofa back a few feet, it also widens the sweet spot for a couple more listeners,but still in the centre is the best seat in the house.
I had the 3 panel non X models back in the mid 80's and used the Premier series from Conrad Johnson to drive them.
The sound was decent, but not as coherent as with the captive servo amps.Again, the non powered panels were the same, but they were highly coloured by the transformer interface, amp and speaker wire of the day.
My friend still listens happily to this day to his AcoustatX speakers(modded and with an AtmaSphere MP3 tube pre/phono(his X amps have XLR connectors but aren't really balanced)that he bought new in 1976.
He paid around $1500.00 for them, about what I paid for my Acoustats used a couple of years ago.I did invest in some new upgraded parts, but I'm happy I did.
Compared to how much old Rogers 5A have appreciated,used working X's are now the bargain.
As stated I would have to spend at least 5 to 6 grand to get a nice pair of Ls3/5A with a nice tube amp and speaker wires, so I think I am ahead of the game.
If I would have followed my friend's advice back in 86, and bought a pair of used X's then, I would be way ahead of the game.
I wouldn't have gone round the merry go round of one love/hate releationship after the other.

