More power for moderate listening levels?


Hi,

I can't seem to find good information regarding the effect of relatively high powered amps on low to moderate listening levels. I have a low powered class A amp that sounds wonderful at moderate volumes but not surprisingly shows signs of strain when cranked up. I am contemplating an upgrade that would bring much more power to solve this problem. However, since I don't play music really loud that often I'm wondering if the upgrade is really all that necessary. It would be worth it if the reserve power of the new amplifier improved sound quality at all levels.     

Thanks for your help,

Brian
brianbiehs
@brianbiehs

If I got this right and the Harbeth is 6 ohms and 86 dB, its actual efficiency is around 84dB. That isn't quite criminally low efficiency, but it is quite low and in most rooms you're going to need about 600 watts to make it play. This is why the amp is being overloaded (which BTW also puts the tweeter in the speaker at risk; that's the classic method to damage a tweeter).


600 watts is a lot of power and that sort of requirement makes it a lot harder and more expensive to find an amp that sounds as good as one that makes only 100 watts. Further, there's really no reason to make a speaker that inefficient. It isn't bandwidth, it isn't speed, it isn't resolution. Plus when speakers are that inefficient, you get thermal compression caused by heating in the voice coils.


If you are driving that speaker with 100 watts (which is about what the Pass will do at clipping) it will make a certain sound pressure. But if the speaker were 94 dB instead of 84, you would need only 10(!) watts to make the same sound pressure. Now my speakers at home are 98dB and just to avoid doing the math I'm going to say for this argument that they are only 97dB... so 3db more than 94dB means that I can make the same sound pressure as you can with only 5 watts. I can tell you that in my listening room which is slightly on the small side that even with my speakers that isn't nearly enough. BTW a 3dB difference is a doubling of amplifier power, a 10dB difference is 10x the amplifier power. Decibels (dB) are on a logarithmic scale since that's how our ears hear.


I'm running an amp that makes about 45 watts/channel and its impossible to clip it in my room. To put that in perspective, that would be like having an amp that has 900 watts/channel in your system. In simple terms you're a country mile off when it comes to matching these two products.


The simple solution here is that if you like that amp and don't feel like going on the hunt for a 600-900w/channel **integrated** amplifier, change out the speakers for something more efficient! The combo might sound great at low levels, but if you want to hit anything that might be considered 'satisfying' its not going to work as you well know.
@atmasphere 
Here's Stereophile's test of the Harbeth SLH5 plus.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/harbeth-super-hl5plus-loudspeaker-measurements
It drops to 6 ohms at one point, and just below 6 ohms at another point.  But for much of the range it is over 8, and for some of the range significantly over 8.  With the degree of variation of impedance that one can see in the plot, how does one assign a nominal single value in ohms to describe the impedance of this speaker?
how does one assign a nominal single value in ohms to describe the impedance of this speaker?
Everyone does it different I imagine. 'Nominally' this looks like an 8 ohm speaker- if so that throws off my efficiency calculation by about 1.5dB. The impedance curve looks fairly benign, which is good. Its really the efficiency/sensitivity (which since its nominally 8 ohms are about the same thing) which is the issue here. Its assumed from the plot that the amplifier won't make a lot of power driving the impedance peaks- since the amp is a voltage source and the speaker is intended for that. 
My Klipsch KLF 20 with 100Watts Denon receiver sounds better, more live and dynamic with electronic and dance music than my Gershman Grand Avant Garde powered by 125Watts Plinius SA 102. As someone suggested, a separate system for dance music may be a cheaper solution if you have a space. Used KLF 20 and 100Watts receiver (or int amp) will cost $1000 or less.
By the way, my Harbeth C7ES sounds good at moderate listening level, but when cranked up with 125 Watts class A amp, it sounds stretched and nosisy. 
@atmasphere 
@twoleftears 

I purchased the Pass based on the measurements given by stereophile as well as reports of folks achieving great sound with lower power tube amps driving the Shl5. So far so good. With the volume halfway, the sound at my chair is fantastic with no strain. I'm a big fan of the sound when these two components are put together. The limitations of the system become apparent at much higher levels and with certain types of music. My assumption is that the bigger Pass integrated would clean up the sound at higher decibels and would be a measure of protection against speaker damage if one of my family members decided to crank it when I'm not around. Aside from the balanced design of the bigger Pass, does the extra headroom power-wise afford better sound at the levels that I normally listen to? For that matter, what are your opinions on balanced vs. single-ended designs? I would also be able to use the balanced outputs on my DAC.