Sound Absorption Behind and Between the Speakers?


Recently my system moved to a new listening room and I was not enjoying the sound very much. There is a window between and behind the speakers. Last night, I put three sound absorbing panels right in front of the window and added a couple salt lamps which illuminate the panels. The sound instantly became way better! I have a soundstage now! I am not sure why though. Do the absorbing panels really have that much of an effect? Or does the fact that I added the panels with the salt lamps give my mind a surface to project the soundstage on which makes a bigger difference? Bit of both?
128x128mkgus
I ended up adding two absorbing panels behind my speakers and it allowed me to fully open the rear port on my sierra raal towers from ascend acoustic. Without the panels I had to use a partial plug that blocked the outer diameter of the port because the bass was overly muddy. It is now a fuller and tighter sound. And I find that diffusers are best at first reflection points on sidewalls and ceiling and on back wall and back sides of side walls. At least in my house of stereo and for my taste. Never made sense to me to have diffusers on front wall behind front facing midrange drivers and tweeters  since diffusers only diffuse higher frequencies.
@hilde45, the reason for treatment on the front wall is to control first reflections and then help on the axial direction.
Absorbtion and Diffraction (either / both) works above 500 Hz.
Bass Trap Placement is at corners and at ceiling / floor / wall intersections.
A lot is happening in the immediate space around a loudspeaker beginning with radiation pattern / edge diffraction / port energy / cabinet /
stand resonance.
Drywall has a relatively high absorption coefficient, foundation walls are well damped but highly reflective. 
Reflections aggregate / accumulate and decay in time domain (waterfall plot).
Look for a balance ...
I once had a fireplace in the middle behind my speakers with glass doors on the enclosure - - it did great damage to the soundstage due to first reflection point issues.  Absorption worked for me then for dedicated listening sessions (but really did not work for my SO!).  Now in a dedicated room I have a wall with GIK panels behind the speakers and I enjoy a deep and expansive sound space.  Maybe deflection would work even better, but I love my art panels - - much more interesting to look at for me!  I also employ absorption at the side wall, ceiling, and floor first reflection points.
@rego and others,

Rego pointed out that:

the reason for treatment on the front wall is to control first reflections and then help on the axial direction.

If the time it takes for the first reflection behind the speakers is longer than the time it takes the sound from front of the speakers to my ears, why would I need to treat them?
Smearing is the term of reference that I see used ... the reflections still have energy ... in a room that is very 'bright' this energy is at higher levels longer.
This is about reinforcement and interference interactions.
The reflections do not stop at the first reflection but go on to two, three and lot more.
These are all ripples at many frequencies in the pond that is the listening space ...