2. tech-talk
  3. 157932-137904

Vinyl / High qual analog tape / High-res digital -- One of these is not like the other

One common theme I read on forums here and elsewhere is the view by many that there is a pecking order in quality:

Top - High Quality Analog TapeNext - VinylBottom - Digital

I will go out on a limb and say that most, probably approaching almost all those making the claim have never heard a really good analog tape machine and high resolution digital side by side, and have certainly never heard what comes out the other end when it goes to vinyl, i.e. heard the tape/file that went to the cutter, then compared that to the resultant record?

High quality analog tape and high quality digital sound very similar. Add a bit of hiss (noise) to digital, and it would be very difficult to tell which is which. It is not digital, especially high resolution digital that is the outlier, it is vinyl. It is different from the other two.  Perhaps if more people actually experienced this, they would have a different approach to analog/vinyl?

This post has nothing to do with personal taste. If you prefer vinyl, then stick with it and enjoy it. There are reasons why the analog processing that occurs in the vinyl "process" can result in a sound that pleases someone. However, knowledge is good, and if you are set in your ways, you may be preventing the next leap.
roberttdid
roberttdid OP
534 posts
 
Somewhere out there Mike, there is a guy called George who would say your amplifiers are crap because they don't double in power output when you 1/2 the speaker impedance  :-) ...  and no I am not the one saying that and I don't agree with him.

What I will say is that even the peak watt meters will response somewhat "slow", and if there is a vast difference between the vinyl and digital wattage readings, that's the mastering, not whatever the source is, unless the source is artificially creating a "softer" sound.

Compared to CD, tape at 15, even 7.5 will have an extended frequency response past 20KHz. Compared to 24/96 or 24/192, the digital will have a much better frequency response >20KHz.
Musicians seem to most note the difference between vinyl and digital. They like how they sound on vinyl, but feel that high res digital is closer to reality (with all its warts).




geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
As far as I know I’m the only friendly goofball physicist here and I’m a tape person through and though, at least these days, unless there’s a whole lotta tweakin’ going on with the CD and the CD transport as I’ve been counseling, even then...  These truths are self-evident.
roberttdid OP
534 posts
 
There, fixed it for you, both in accuracy, and in brevity. This will be the only attention I give you in this thread, so I would enjoy it while you can.

geoffkait22,775 posts06-18-2020 4:05pmAs far as I know I’m the only goofball here.

geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
Robberrttddidd, you are a bean brain. No hard feelings, though. You don’t need to pose for the camera. 🏋🏻‍♂️ We see through you like you were made of glass. 
glupson
7,842 posts
 
"We see through you like you were made of glass."
Are you saying he is fragile but sharp?
More to discover