I would think field coil technology would enable higher sensitivity designs by nature due to stronger magnetic fields being made possible than with natural magnetic materials.
I've assumed that the potential for greater magnitude magnetic fields (and hence potentially greater sensitivity in accordance) is the prime benefit of FC technology and why I personally would covet such an approach for its game changing potential ?
Still waiting for the first field coil walsh driver to make it to market.
John Strohbeen, are you listening? I suspect the OHM CLS 2 way Walsh driver approach would lend itself best to pushing the limits using a field coil approach.
DDD drivers might benefit as well but tend to do less of the bass s perhaps less beneficial there.
Full range Walsh drivers can be destroyed relatively easily still using conventional magnetic fields, so perhaps less value there.
I've assumed that the potential for greater magnitude magnetic fields (and hence potentially greater sensitivity in accordance) is the prime benefit of FC technology and why I personally would covet such an approach for its game changing potential ?
Still waiting for the first field coil walsh driver to make it to market.
John Strohbeen, are you listening? I suspect the OHM CLS 2 way Walsh driver approach would lend itself best to pushing the limits using a field coil approach.
DDD drivers might benefit as well but tend to do less of the bass s perhaps less beneficial there.
Full range Walsh drivers can be destroyed relatively easily still using conventional magnetic fields, so perhaps less value there.