The best CD Player for the money


I AM IN THE PROCESS OF BUYING A CD PLAYER AND I DONT KNOW WHICH WAY TO GO.WITH SO MANY TO CHOOSE FROM I WANT TO PURCHASE SOMETHING GOOD BUT I DONT WANT TO SPEND 10,000 EITHER.
jazze22
All the players mentioned are great and its much easier to get good digital sound now than 10 - 15 yrs ago. I especialy endorse the above opinions of the Musical Fidelity A3, Arcam fmj or alpha nine for straight-up engrossing musicality. I also heard the Micromega stage 3 and thought it was pretty good (now they're up to stage 5 I think). Those are all open, fast and musically engaging types of players. If you want something more smooth and listenable try California Audio Labs, Meridian, or Rega (all great players...just not my style). p.s. if anyone is absolutely strapped for cash and needs a cd player the TEAC PDH-500 at a mere $250 is a sleeper (low bass is not convincing but upper midrange very exciting and detailed, not boring at all!)
I agree with the Sony SCD C333ES. Can be found new at close out prices of $400-$500 which is a great bargain!
Granite Audio tube CD player, I have one, better than Sony SCD-777ES in SACD, in both my system and my friend's Don's (the Granite Audio owner's) systems. I have heard it.
Retail $2900 but advertised for less by Quest for Sound.
A real bargain. Is it the very best, that I can't say, but its awful good!
I did not have the time nor the energy to go on an audition rampage. A dealer was nice enough to let me try an Arcam FMJ CD23 at home for a week. I think there is something to the dCS converter thing. After one day I decided to go for it. You can say that my venerable JVC 1010 could not, after so many years, put up much of a fight. However, it was good while it lasted. I think time has shown that their focusing on jitter as a source of digitalitis was correct. The Japanese are not deaf you know. (Somewhat interesting aside, I remember reading about a doctor well versed in human hearing whose contention, based on research it seems, is that different nationalities hear somewhat differently depending on what the dominant range of frequencies is in the language they speak. This was years ago. If memory serves, is name is Dr. Tomatis. Such an assertion, if made today, could founder on the reef of political correctness though. End of digression) The uncertainties as to new formats are such that I don't see how someone should mortgage the farm to get a very expensive cd player that can't be upgraded. Insofar as the ones which offer upgrading capabilities, another dealer steered me right when he said that they are so expensive as to make the purchase of a less expensive model, followed by something good in a newer format, less expensive than an all out frontal assault on the biggies. I was eyeing a Simaudio Moon, It's built about five minutes from my home, but price-wise, it is something more like the distance from my humble abode to the moon (pun intended). My recommendation based on a home audition vs. a few minutes of in-store audition of a Sugden (no opinion), another player of French manufacture (hate to be vague, but c'est la vie)(no opinion) and a half hour in-store audition without my own recordings of a Rotel RCD 991, good player for the price. I was forgetting, also spent a little in-store-between-more- important-stuff time with a few other low priced players. Somewhat interesting point: three separate dealers used the Rotel RCD 991 as a foil in trying to sell me something else; in two cases more expensive (one dealer an Arcam or Naim, the other a Linn), the third one, curiously enough, was trying to push a player that is almost half the price of the Rotel: the Roksan Kandy. This last unit, was the most surprising of the runners-up, so to speak, considering its price. It was auditioned under pretty bad conditions. The dealer was a very nice guy, the room was awful, (a throwback to the wall of Japanese speakers days) it was compared with a Rega Planet through Roksan electronics and Paradigm 40 or 60 speakers with unknown (well to me at least) recordings. My conclusion, the Rega was a letdown considering its build-up, both in writing and word-of-mouth. Somewhat sombre, heavier in its presentation, but it may be worth a listen in a better overall system. The Kandy, at least in contrast to the Rega, evidenced a more light weight presentation in a way, that made the music a lot more airy, lively in its overall character, and the instruments better defined. In closing, given half a chance at a home audition any one of these players may have stood a chance at adoption. In the brief period I have had with the Arcam, I have not lived to regret my purchase yet. The reason: the retrieval of details and the rightness of the tone of the instruments. Woody instruments sound, well, woody and brass instruments, well, brassy; a better sense of the harmonics of the instruments (guitar, piano, reeds) which are not portrayed with that sort of one dimensional, one note/one frequency quality. Call it bloom if you want. It simply sounds more like musical instruments in the room. Can't say much more than that. Insofar as 'mo better stuff but used, I just ain't got the time.
I liked the ARCAM's tonal integrity , bloom and utter harmonic naturalness, too, but felt it had serious PRaT problems compared to the Rotel and ALL other contenders. Just seemed to dance with two left feet....
Certainly a rich sound with lots 'o finesse, though.