2. digital
  3. 152539-7805

Does the 'Buck' Start with the DAC?

Some members have expressed that the server / streaming front end is less important than the DAC.

I subscribe to the position that "Everything Matters"

As I consider front end choices, I'm trying to gauge if I should be leaning more heavily on a DAC versus a SOURCE (server / streamer).

Feedback and perspective from both camps, or any others, will be helpful. Thank you.

Please Note:  I'm not looking for validation of the position that "only the bits" matter... I accept that some believe this wholeheartedly... and that's okay by me. 
david_ten
headphonedreams
522 posts
 
Maybe check out dCS Bartok?
It has both dac and streamer

  https://www.stereophile.com/content/dcs-bartok-da-processorheadphone-amplifier

Otherwise, as a pure guess, I would start with 20k dac and 10k streamer.
thyname's avatar
thyname
3,107 posts
 
@david_ten : Is your sonicTransporter also your streamer?

Here is my current breakdown in MSRP prices (obviously, getting a nice deal or used helps 😉):

DAC: $13,500 (MSB Discrete with ProISL USB module and second optional discrete power supply)

Server / Streamer (USB out to DAC): $4,250 (Innuos ZENith MK3)

Then of course you have the USB cable, the power cords, the Ethernet cable, etc.
david_ten OP
5,480 posts
 
Based on the responses so far, the DAC is a higher priority than the streaming source.

What percentage breakdown do members advise? 

DAC : Streaming Source

Thanks.
david_ten OP
5,480 posts
 
@headphonedreams  Thanks for your suggested allocation of 2 : 1.

I have heard the dCS Bartok in a system, as well as the Rossini (twice) and a full Vivaldi stack.
david_ten OP
5,480 posts
 
@thyname  Your current breakdown is roughly 3 : 1

Do you feel that allocation is a good one to target?

I have had the Zenith M3 in my system.

I chose to leave cabling out of the discussion, for obvious reasons. : )
More to discover