@andy2 ...*L* Oh, goody....R/T 'engagement! Or close enuff'...
I've been DIY'ing Walsh speakers for awhile now; not the current Ohm variety, but closer to the original F's and A's and the HHR in intent, But...
Size of the 'main' driver is larger than HHRs' smaller 'stand alone' driver and the German Physiks, covering the 'upper mids through upper bass'.
Hand off the lower bass to a sub...they're more efficient at it (and, MHO, most of the reason folks blew up the originals, due to cone collapse...) and bass being omni by nature anyhow...
High end: a smaller Walsh, lighter cone, based kinda like the Infinity 'ice cream cone' driver of awhile back. I've chatted with one who 'was there' in the creation of it, literally done on a kitchen table. We've traded stories, both on and off topic... ;)
Tweet above main, vertical alignment.
I have working prototypes....working on Better.
"Be Afraid..." *L* Not many have heard IRL....those who have, Like.
Any thoughts?
I've been DIY'ing Walsh speakers for awhile now; not the current Ohm variety, but closer to the original F's and A's and the HHR in intent, But...
Size of the 'main' driver is larger than HHRs' smaller 'stand alone' driver and the German Physiks, covering the 'upper mids through upper bass'.
Hand off the lower bass to a sub...they're more efficient at it (and, MHO, most of the reason folks blew up the originals, due to cone collapse...) and bass being omni by nature anyhow...
High end: a smaller Walsh, lighter cone, based kinda like the Infinity 'ice cream cone' driver of awhile back. I've chatted with one who 'was there' in the creation of it, literally done on a kitchen table. We've traded stories, both on and off topic... ;)
Tweet above main, vertical alignment.
I have working prototypes....working on Better.
"Be Afraid..." *L* Not many have heard IRL....those who have, Like.
Any thoughts?