Is integrated the future for 2 channel audiophiles?


More and more integrated hitting the shelves. Although, there are plenty of dedicated preamps, I have just noticed lots of increased discussions over the past 2 years for integrated amps. 

In general, consumers are downsizing. Baby boomers retiring and going to smaller homes. Millennials and gen z prefer smaller homes as well ( in general - there are always exceptions). 

I think the turntable trendiness has leveled off ( there will always be vinyl fans...I’m talking about the people purchasing because it’s trendy). 

The masses probably favor a/v receivers. However, it seems integrated amp choices has increased quite a bit for 2 channel fans. 

Thoughts?
aberyclark

Integrated: Reduced Space; Remote Volume; Reduced Interconnects; Reduced Cost.

Remote Volume (modern preamp or modern integrated) effects top shelf space requirements. I used both SS and Tube Amps (Stereo or Mono) for many years on lower shelves before I wanted remote volume. Remote volume requires at least desk high shelf height (my top shelf) for remote beam use.

Reduced Space:

My 13’ wide room, large speakers away from corners, leaves only 88” linear shelf for active components. R2R on top reduces that to 88”. TT reduces it to 48” = only two short stacks of equipment, 4 of which use remotes.

1 digital stack, 3 remote devices:

Single CD, Multiple CD, Chase Remote Line Controller (my separate digital integrated, I use primarily for remote balance of CD’s, especially compilations of separate recording sessions). I found, a very slight balance tweak can make a surprising amount of difference to many CD tracks. It goes to my Integrated Tube Amp's AUX input.

1 tube stack, 1 remote.

Tube preference, heat from tubes effects top shelf space requirements.

I just designed and built a ventilated enclosure with floating solid glass top so I can stack my modern Integrated Tube Amp Cayin A88T over my old McIntosh Tube FM Tuner/Preamp, mx110z. (they only made 6 tube tuner/preamps, 'separates' took over soon after). The McIntosh incorporating FM Tuner, Phono EQ, Tape EQ reduces the need for those separates. Note: my choices of modern tube amp is limited to units with 16 ohm taps. I expected my modern Carver FM Tuner to beat the mx110z FM tuner, but happily the McIntosh FM is equally awesome. A dedicated FM antenna is needed for these older tuners. I listen to one station, WBGO Jazz, so the Carver was on a lower shelf.

As it has no remote control, I could put the McIntosh Tube Tuner/Preamp 1 shelf down, as I did with prior tube receivers, but that is a compromise I never liked.


It does seem like more all in one units are becoming commonplace. Personally, I run an integrated with a streamer-dac. This is a two box system and for many years I had separates and a "stack" of components. I'm just not into component swap outs anymore. I'm enjoying what I have.
The new Aesthetix mimas with the phono stage option has caught my attention. 
I heard the Aesthetix Mimas with a pair of Vandersteen Quatro Wood CT speakers and they sounded incredible. Soundstage came at me from every angle. I just could not believe heft it delivered. Mind you, this is a 150 WPC integrated with more than enough power. On the other-hand, my 120 WPC Simaudio W-3 is decent, but the Aesthetix really drove those babies. Full disclosure: I have the Vandersteen Treo CTs and torn between the  Audio Research tubed separates vs. the Mimas. What do you think and have you had any experience with either models?


Cheers