Not being familiar with the Luxman 507 ux I decided to do a search
(it's a integrated amp), but only found the latest version, the 507uxII. Positive Feedback reviewed it in September of 2018. This is what PF had to say
>
" L-507uXII is biased relatively richly into Class A operation, and indeed, while the amplifier never ran hot, it did get quite warm under normal operating conditions, so be advised that adequate ventilation is required. Having said that, the Luxman's sonics improved noticeably as it warmed up, and I typically left the amplifier powered up continuously to ensure optimum performance.
> The L-507uXII likewise reproduced the treble range with a level of transparency and refinement that was unique in my experience. Cymbals, bells and other high-frequency instruments were reproduced with a clarity and ease that was utterly beguiling.
> The only potential limitation to the Luxman's performance was in relation to its ability to recreate a soundstage. This is not to say that the L-507uXII was was a slouch in the soundstaging department. Far from it. The Luxman threw a wide, deep soundstage, populated with palpable images. However, image layering and focus within that stage was not as finely-drawn and tactile as I've heard from competing amplifiers. "
MSRP $6500. The MSRP of the 507 uX looked closer to $4700.
There are a lot of really good sounding current tech (not accounting for GaN) class D amps (no integrateds) in the ux price range to consider. The highs could be abated with input op-amps and/or cabling.
Now I realize teo-audio was talking about his observation after his class D Ice amp was powered down for a couple days with what input buffer?), but who needs to do that when they are so efficient? Seems like a nothing burger to me
>
" L-507uXII is biased relatively richly into Class A operation, and indeed, while the amplifier never ran hot, it did get quite warm under normal operating conditions, so be advised that adequate ventilation is required. Having said that, the Luxman's sonics improved noticeably as it warmed up, and I typically left the amplifier powered up continuously to ensure optimum performance.
> The L-507uXII likewise reproduced the treble range with a level of transparency and refinement that was unique in my experience. Cymbals, bells and other high-frequency instruments were reproduced with a clarity and ease that was utterly beguiling.
> The only potential limitation to the Luxman's performance was in relation to its ability to recreate a soundstage. This is not to say that the L-507uXII was was a slouch in the soundstaging department. Far from it. The Luxman threw a wide, deep soundstage, populated with palpable images. However, image layering and focus within that stage was not as finely-drawn and tactile as I've heard from competing amplifiers. "
MSRP $6500. The MSRP of the 507 uX looked closer to $4700.
There are a lot of really good sounding current tech (not accounting for GaN) class D amps (no integrateds) in the ux price range to consider. The highs could be abated with input op-amps and/or cabling.
Now I realize teo-audio was talking about his observation after his class D Ice amp was powered down for a couple days with what input buffer?), but who needs to do that when they are so efficient? Seems like a nothing burger to me

