Audiophiles should learn from people who created audio


The post linked below should be a mandatory reading for all those audiophiles who spend obscene amounts of money on wires. Can such audiophiles handle the truth?

http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wire.htm

defiantboomerang
defiantboomerang

The post linked below should be a mandatory reading ...

It’s one thing to suggest that readers here do something. It’s another to be told we "should" do something. Who are you to declare what is "mandatory?"

"Defiantboomerang." Your name says it all.
@cleeds 

According to the Cambridge dictionary, you are quite wrong. This is what they have to say about "should".

"We use should most commonly to talk about what is the ideal or best thing to do in a situation."

And below is the link to the relevant page. You should follow it. :))

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british -grammar/modals-and-modality/should 

But the key question remains: can cablephiles handle the truth?
Cables do make difference !
Good cables is not design to improve the sound but to enable the system to fulfill its full potential .Bad cable might severly degrade the sound of a good system however  good cable will not improve the sound of a bad system.