Musical Fidelity A-5: Can its sound quality compete with today's top rated integrateds?


I have seen several members asking about vintage speakers and separates. I currently own a Rogue Sphinx v.1  hybrid integrated which is a very good amp and also has a very good phono stage. Rogue has introduced  v.2 version of Sphinx integrated with upgrades, that is, a lower noise floor, and much welcomed higher gain phono stage. The amp remains at 100RMS  (Upgrading from a Sphinx v.1 to a v-2 cost $400 plus shipping both ways; I am on the West Coast).

I am curious if the musical Fidelity A-5 which is 250RMS. with supposedly a good phono section. My question is: Can the A-5 issued in 2004 equal or outperform the new somewhat improved Rogue Sphinx v.2 . I have heard other Musical Fidelity amp and integrateds, but not the A-5.  I am considering one of Magneplanar  speakers under $2000, or possibly another top rated box speaker of  low efficiency, so the extra power  of the A-5 would be welcomed.

However, buying a 12 year old integrated  amp, the sound quality may be just typical solid state sound, that is, clean, accurate, but generally SS sound which is rarely exceptional. The Rogue Sphinx v.1 is a good sounding amp, though has some operational limitations. However, the sound falls into that category of SS quality which too often  generally lacks of emotional excitement and content ( to use a somewhat vague description).  Would like some feed back  about the MF A-5, especially if you owned one, but moved onto newer and more expensive  brand electronics.    Thank you  

sunnyjim
For the sake of an old geezer member, what does YMMV mean??. Two responders used this cyber speaker in their replies.   Thanx
Your Milage May Vary.
A catch phrase indicating no two set ups are alike due to all the different variables (ancillary equipment, cabling, room, tastes, etc.) so what they describe in their set up doesn't guarantee the same results in yours.

All the best,
Nonoise