2. misc-audio
  3. 1078446891

Did you ever just want to simplify?

Have you ever longed for a simpler system? Or a less complicated version of this hobby? I prefer simplicity, but somehow my audio system got complicated. Tubes, digital seperates, expensive cables, various tweaks, 100 lb. amps. I studied a lot and each bit of knowledge caused me to think about every aspect of an audio system, and every audio review or online commentary caused me to dream of new components. Some days it sounds good, others it doesn't. It's a resolving system and every tweak has an impact that seems to cause the equilibrium to resettle. Of course, it's never perfect, just different flavors. Sometimes I wonder if it was worth it. Sometimes i dream of a simpler system. Just turn it on and enjoy the music. Not have to worry about now which tube is going bad, trying to find the perfect tube for the DAC, what happened to my bass today, do I really need that big audio rack, why can't I rearrange the living room to get perfect sound forever? A nice integrated, a one-box (front loading) CDP, some unobtrusive speakers, a few good cables, a power conditioner (a luxury item in a simple system, but worth it in my experience) -- good. Now for the music.
budrew
baileyje
45 posts
 
I've only been at this for about 8 months. I have old NAD equipment and PSB Image 2b speakers. Not much money involved. However, tonight I was alone and listened to Sweet Honey and the Rock. I could hear all the distinct voices, breathing, diction, I could tell the placement of all the singers, and I was thrilled with the depth of overtones and the richness of their voices. I love it and hope I keep my gear simple so I don't get caught up in worrying about my equipment. Having said that, I hope those who get as much enjoyment out of tweaking and upgrading as I do listening, keep it up. Without them I wouldn't be learning nearly as much from this site.
sfar's avatar
sfar
1,756 posts
 
.
Do it.

I've just gone through that process, replacing a stack of separates on a big rack and floorstanders with a one-box cd player, monitors and (gasp!) a receiver.

It's a more satisfying system in several ways. It doesn't dominate the room or, more important, the experience of listening to the music. It cost less, and the things I've spent the difference on have all been a lot of fun.

Most surprising, it sounds better. I don't know how to explain that except, perhaps, by assuming that aiming a little lower got me newer gear that benefits from advancements in the technology and that I've paid attention to the recommendations here on Audiogon, leading to some good choices.

When I made the decision to downgrade I consoled myself at first, telling myself it was an 'interim' system. (But, then, they all are, aren't they?) Instead, I'm really happy with how it's all worked out and I'm enjoying the music more, not less.
rny
54 posts
 
Yes, I think the process of simplification can be the solution to a general over-involvement with the gear. When your objective is reduced complexity, refinement is key to avoid compromises in any area. For me it cost more to get less, but the result was well worth it.

There is no denying the thrill of the chase for great audio equipment. But when you get to the point of "the minimum amount you have is the best you'll need", the value once held by audio magazines and dealer showrooms is gone. I enjoyed the journey and felt a little depressed when I arrived.
isellstuff
99 posts
 
YES, but then I realize that my brother has gone through
4 cheapo all-in-1 units from best buy within the last
4 years. Each one was at least $140 min.
for a bedroom system they`re okay, but for a
music/home theater room like I have, I wouldn`t even
bother looking at them.
pin
10 posts
 
That's exactly what I have - A NAD C372/C542 combo, a pair of Monitor Audio Bronze B2's modified by Rick of Selah Audio, some VDH C5 IC & Audioquest Type 2 (double-run) speaker cables. A very simple kit that makes music enjoyable.
More to discover