Pre/Pro comparison on these please.

I haven't heard the other 5 on your list, but I can tell you that the B&K Ref 50 is probably not up to par. I had one shortly(about 3 weeks) as a loaner while I was waiting for my pre/pro and I didn't even like it for HT. It was noisy and somewhat compressed and dark sounding.

I have heard lots of good things about the Bryston, especially for music.

Another pre/pro you should consider is a Proceed AVP2. I know Proceed is not around anymore but there was NEVER any issues with the AVP, and if you buy one from a dealer that still has them, you're at least somewhat covered. I had the original AVP for about 4 years. While IMO, HT processing is not up there with the best, Lexicon, etc.. 2 channel was outstanding.

Eandylee:

You're right...the EAD TM8000pro is a bit more but well worth it. I've seen a couple of units on the used market that wouldn't be that much of a stretch for you.

You might want to talk Steve Holt at EAD. Because lots of people traded in TM8000pro's for the 8800...you probably can get a great deal on an 8000pro...which I would still prefer to anything on your list.

I have absolutely no affiliation with EAD....but have been very impressed with their products.

Harry

2 channel was my primary concern as well. After comparing several Pre/Pros I ended up with a lowly Bryston SP1.7 and love it.

I would add this.... Several of the Processors you mentioned (and both of the ones added) perform very well. What I might like best, you may not. 3k is a lot of bones. I would audition every one of them, in home if your dealer will let you.

Hey Distortion:

Wanna reactivate the Bryston v. EAD debate??

Harry

I think I will pass on that one Harry.

Besides it wasnt much of a performance debate. To be honest, I am not really sure what it was, or better yet, who was served by it.

Arent you a Doctor (psychology)? I thought you guys stayed busy, or has Ritalin knocked out all the problems?