Pass X Pre - Ruthlessly revealling?

I do find the Pass X preamps, at least the X2.5 that I use, very revealing, I wouldn't use ruthless though. As Bigkidz says, system matching is very important, this has become more and more apparent to me as I have progressed in this hobby.

I find it interesting that your dealer dropped Pass when they went from the Aleph to the X; the X amps are known to be neutral, I would agree with this as I find the X150.5 the most neutral I've owned, not that I have a lot of experience. I will stop here with the assessment as not to start a flame war.

Furthermore, I found the X2.5 to need at least 3-4 days of straight play before break-in. At first hookup it was veiled, the next day it opened up but was agressive, after about 4 days it settled in and I enjoy it a lot and do find I have the most revealing system I have ever had, I do not mean this in a negative sense but rather positive.

I will reiterate what Bigkidz has already said, system matching is very important. I had a Concentra II that was excellent with B&W N803's, a switch of speakers and it fell on its face.

I am not sure what published reviews you are refering to that state the X amps as harsh, as with Bigkidz, I do not view them this way. But in my system I do not view my X2.5 preamp as laid back either. Remember, the XA amps are an addition to the Pass line, not a replacement for the X amps.

The inside scoop is that some dealers dropped Pass because Pass didn't continue to allow them to have exclusive distribution as they once enjoyed. Other examples of this are Audio Research, B&W, Levinson -- you can't buy their product from an out-of-state dealer, unless you have no local dealer. This is a carriage trade game that's been played for years, and successfully.

Pass is a great company. You couldn't ask for better customer service. Search the threads, and you'll find many comments about how helpful & friendly they are, and how they go out of their way to help, even out of warranty.

The X preamps are excellent, as are the X amps. The X-1 is very revealing, but I would never call it 'ruthless'. The top end is extended & detailed, but does have a certain roundness to the sound that is preferred by many, and definitely preferable to the thin shrill quality I hear in transistor preamps. In the end, it is a question of musical taste, opinion, matching. They do not have a recessed or retiring sound, but most certainly not harsh. I'm a tube guy, so no transistor piece does, to my ears, what tubes do, but the X amps do have a fullness in the midrange which is often lacking in transistor units. But this was typical of Nelson's designs back from the Threshold age.

Interesting answers. I have owned a Pass Aleph 3 for many years, and really enjoy it, so I'm not intending to start any flame wars. I have heard it next to several other amps, and the only thing so far which beat it without compromise was a pair of AtmaSphere MA60s (which sounded quite similar in mjany ways, to my ears). I've been running a Wadia direct, which I'd like to upgrade, but will probably need a preamp. Pass seemed like a natural, since I like my Aleph so much, but I have Talon speakers, which like warmish sounding equipment, hence my concern over some of the things I've heard about the X lineup. BTW, I agree 100% about system synergy being the most important "component". At high-end shops, I usually ask to hear their "Ultra" systems if they're not too busy. I am often disappointed at how ordinary or even bad some of these systems sound. You really can't just string a bunch of $5,000 boxes together and have it sound good automatically.