2. digital
  3. 1126769860

Reference DACS: An overall perspective

There has been many threads the last few months regarding the sonic signature of some of the highest regarded reference DACS (Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) here on the GON. I have been very fortunate to audtion many of these wonderful pieces in my home or friend's systems. I wanted to share, in a systematic way, my impressions/opinions with you GON members for a two reasons: 1)That my experiences might be helpful to fellow members interested in audtioning these DACS. 2)Starting an interesting discussion regarding the different "sonic flavors" of these reference digital front ends. I totally agree with the statement, "if you have not heard it you don't have an opinion". Therefore, I have no comments regarding DACS from Weiss,Goldmund,Audio Aero and Burmester because I have never had the pleasure of audtioning them. I would love to hear from members who have and share their experiences with us. My overall impression is that these DACS(Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) can be grouped into two molar categories regarding their overall sonic signature. By the way, all of them can throw a large/deep soundstage with excellent layering in the acoustic space with "air" around individual players on that stage. However, than they start to part company into two major categories. Category #1) These DACS "flavors" revolve around pristine clarity, fine sharp details,speed,very extended top/bottom frequencies,and great PRAT. These DACS never sound "etched" or "in your face" but are more "upfront" then "layed back" in their presentation. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Dcs,Ensemble,Meitner. My personnal favorite in this group is the Ensemble, which I owned for two years. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Wilson,Thiel,Dynaudio, Focal/JM Labs. Category #2) These DACS "flavors" revolve around a "musical/organic" sense, natural timbres,and an easy flowing liquidity. Their "less forward" presentation my give the impression of less detail, but I think in this case its an illusion fostered by their more relaxed/organic manner. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts. I did find that the tube DACS did not have the top/bottom frequency extenstion and PRAT of the SS DACS in this bracket. For me, the Accustic Arts DAC1-MK3 gave me the best of both categories, therefore it is now the resident DAC in my system. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Magnepan,Von Schweikert,Sonus Faber. Well, it's all just my opinion regarding these digital pieces, but I hope this post was at least informative/somewhat interesting and would lend itself to other GON members sharing their impressions, not about what DAC is the "BEST" in the world, but your personnal taste and synergy with your system.
teajay
exlibris
438 posts
 
John,
Thank you.
I haven't heard the two side by side but I would have thought that the AA Cap II would have been pretty much on par with the Reimyo and that significant difference in price could not be justified. Interesting.
Yes, the CD duplicator is very good. I've had a technician take out the switching power supply on mine and replace it with, what is essentially, two linear supplies: one outboard and one in the unit. The improvement was greater than I could have hoped for. I posted my findings in the "How come there is no thread on the RealityCheck?" thread.
jafox
1,447 posts
 
Wow! Already there are audio diehards upgrading the CD Duplicator. I love it. By some time next year I will throw in the towel and just leave well enough alone for a few years as was the case back in the mid 80s into the early 90s.

As for the AA Cap and the Reimyo, Art has posted some comments on A'gon indicating as wonderful as the AA is, the Reimyo is quite a step up in performance.

John
exlibris
438 posts
 
Has anyone heard the new Reimyo DAP-777 (mkII)? If so, how does its presentation differ from the old model?
Here is a nice review of it:
http://www.ultraaudio.com/equipment/reimyo_dap777.htm
teajay OP
1,655 posts
 
Exlibris, I auditioned the Reimyo DAP-777 when my reference was still the Ensemble Hi-DAC and found it quite musical with relatively good details, but lacked the extension on the top and bottom, precise placement of players in the soundstage, and prat of the Ensemble DAC. That's when I next auditioned the Accustic Arts DAC1-MK3 and found it had the virtues of my Ensemble piece plus a more "analog/organic" quality in its over all sonic signature. So, my hunch would be if you don't end up liking the AA gear, the Reimyo might not be the flavor you would be looking for. It's definitively a type #2 DAC without the dynamics/extension of the Accustic Arts DAC in my opinion. Did you get the Stealth Sextet cable yet? How's the AA gear sounding to your ear's now?
exlibris
438 posts
 
Teajay,
Thanks. The Stealth cable has not arrived yet. Hopefully it will be there when I get home from work.
The AA is sounding much better. As it is, I could live with either my set-up or the AA. Your characterization of the AA is accurate.

The AA is:
-more relaxed
-has slightly better 'action,' in that in projects into the room better.
-is slightly more organic and balanced
x-a little veiled
x-'thin' sounding

The EMM (without CDSD) is:
-more transparent
-has better body, density, weight, three-dimensionality
-a slightly deeper soundstage
x-a little aggressive
x-still a little thin (in comparison with the Audio Aero Prestige on Redbook)

I'm looking for something beyond what either front end is giving me right now. I may find that by using the Stealth cable with the AA. I may find that by upgrading to the CDSD. I may have to go with something completely different.
More to discover