What's so bad about Sovtek 6922s?


I've seen lots of preamp reviews and remarks where people say they replaced their "hard sounding stock sovteks" with "brand X".

I have an Anthem Pre 2L, and the first thing I tried to do was get rid of the "nasty Sovtek 6922s". I tried the Teslas (new and cheap) and a used set of Amperex Bugleboys. I rotated between the two - very hard to A/B of course. Was not satisfied. The Amperex seem to be allergic to bass (I guess it's possible that these are forgeries - bought off ebay). The Teslas seem like "ok" replacements, but nothing special happens with them.

For the heck of it, I put back in the Sovteks (after many months), and abracadabra - the system sounds its best. Nice microdynamics. Very clean and not the least bit harsh. No unwanted noise. Just sounds very good.

Is anyone else living happily with the "hard sounding stock sovtek 6922s"? Just curious. I am not going to take a stab at some megabuck Telefunkens based on the lack of improvement trying more moderate tube "upgrades".

Are Sovteks underrated?
dozer

Showing 1 response by dekay

Well, the 2L is not a warm sound, IMO (neutral is more like it). Because of this I would guess that this is the type of sound that you prefer from your preamp. If you go to the FAQ section @ audioasylum.com and research your "Amperex" tubes under Joe's Tube Lore you may be able to verify and/or identify them. Amperex 6922 types are not generally shy in the bass region, though new ones do require anywhere from 25-60 hours of playing time for the bass to kick in. Other than bogus Amperex's the namesake has been owned by Richardson Electronics for years and they can re-brand any tube that they like as Amperex, perhaps this is what you purchased?

There are also many different Sovtek 6922's. I received a pair of 1970's versions (boxes marked Upscale Audio) with a used preamp that I purchased and they have an entirely different sound than later production (early 90's on) Sovteks. I also have some 80's Relector 6H23-EB's from ATSI tube that I feel are much better than the later productions.

I myself prefer Amperex/Philips/Mullard types and and am not a Telfunken fan though I have never used their CCA's. As far as Siemens go I find the two Russian varieties mentioned above to be competative sound wise for a lot less money (Siemens are dryer and less warm than Amperex and the like).

Keep in mind that any new tube needs to burned in for X amount of hours and that any tube (new or used) that has been shipped through the mail will sound odd for the first 24-48 hours (regardless of burn in) due to some sort of charge or static that is picked up during transit).