I'd rather have a real selection of SACD software. I too prefer mostly stereo SACD, changing back and forth between multi is not too big a deal with a simple macro on a remote. I don't care about the picture, just distracts from the sound.
I also prefer 2 channel sa-cd playback and would like to see dsd surround encoded hi def blu ray dvd's in the future.
Maineiac, are you able to instantly toggle back and forth between multi-channel and stereo while the disc is still playing? If so, what SACD player do you have? Thanks!
I'd like to see some discs come out in 2.1 format (Stereo plus the LFE channel). As for players, I would like more that have a volume control so you can plug straight into an amp.
I have a Denon 2900, you can't jump between multi and stereo while the disc is playing. I am guessing that you can't do that because those are two different layers of the disc. There is a button on the front of the player that toggles between redbook, stereo SACD, and Multi-SACD but it stops playing the disc. You can set up a macro on your remote to do that from the OSD menu on your player to prevent actually getting off the couch.
Just my opinion, is it not better to have straight two channel rather than 2 +LFE? Since having LFE will mean some sort of processing in the player. If someone has a subwoofer with high level input there is not really any processing done but the crossover simply takes care of it.Which ultimately will mean that the integrity of the sound will be intact.
Correct me if I am wrong in my assumption.
Anyone else has any comment on this?
Just for the record I use the Philips 963SACD/ DVD player and I have the REL STrata III connected directly to my poweramp and I think the sound is great and I have a feeling that it is seamlessly integrated (at least to my ears. My system is two channel only.
You are probably right. My system is multi-channel and my sub is passive. The sub output of my multi-channel pre-amp is connected to the amp that runs my subwoofer. When listening to a stereo SACD, there is no output to the sub. I don't know how I could utilize the sub for both stereo and multi-channel in my system without re-cabling every time.
That is why I thought 2.1 would be good. If you can tell me how I might utilize the sub in both stereo and multi-channel configurations, I'd definitely give it a try.
Since your sub is passive I doubt it has any high level input, right? If so, I cannot think of any way that you can utilise it. Which sub do you have? Does your sub not have a dedicated amp to drive it?
Sorry for the question but I am unable to really understand your systems configuration and also which sub it is.
The sub is passive and has a dedicated amp. It has no high level input. I could probably run my pre-amp's pre-outs into the sub's amp and get it working. But, as I said before, I'd have to re-cable to listen to multi-channel utilizing the discreet LFE channel.
You *could* get quality y-jacks from the pre-out with one set going to your main amp and the other set run to your sub. The signal would be full-range from the pre to the sub so you would have to set the cross-over appropriately. You may also have your main speakers "overlap" the low end since both the sub and the main speakers would be fed the same full-range signal. This could be a negative in your system unless your main speakers lack in bass since this range of signal would be played from both the sub and your main speakers' woofers. Short of having a sub that allows for main ins/outs - i.e., signal goes from pre to sub and then to main amp with the crossover filtering out higher frequencies - this is your best option. Tony
Thanks everyone and sorry to have gotten off the subject somewhat on this thread.
As for the next generation of players, I agree with the others that software is the main issue right now. Right now (don't laugh) things are good. There are more titles coming out than I can afford to buy. Maybe the selection is sparse considering that not all the new SACD's will be to your taste, but I actually find an advantage in that. I end up buying discs that I might not have purchased had I a better selection to choose from, and sometimes it turns me on to something completely new and exciting.
I still worry that the format won't survive much longer.
We are talking about next generation of SACD players but today I was on the Musical Fidelity site and was surprised that they have an SACD player the price of which is 4000 in UK money! That is certainly not cheap at all.
Don't you guys think that at least Musical Fidelity believes that SACD has matured? Why would they introduce such an expensive player otherwise.
I would like to see them drop DVDA, (if it has it), and drop redbook playback, and put the money into output stages