Not having heard both speakers but being familiar with the designs, i'm thinking that there would be a marked difference in presentation. For one thing, you're talking about an all dynamic driver system ( Dunlavy ) against a hybrid ribbon / dynamic ( VMPS ). On top of that, while both speakers use dynamic woofers, the Dunlavy's uses low Q sealed woofers and the VMPS uses a passive radiator. As such, i'd expect the Dunlavy to have noticeably faster / tighter bass with increased definition but the VMPS would probably have more "weight" and greater extension to it. As i mentioned though, these are strictly educated guesses and the bottom line would be your personal preferences in your room.
Having said that, Dunlavy's work best with rather wide spacing between them. If you can't give them room to breath, you might be better off with another speaker. Sean
>
Having said that, Dunlavy's work best with rather wide spacing between them. If you can't give them room to breath, you might be better off with another speaker. Sean
>