sonus faber electa amator iii or magico A1 or any other suggestion

First thank you all for your opinions and suggestions, although i still haven't decided which loud speakers to buy, but i will and it will be soon !:)
@verdantaudio ill think about your suggestion and update you later, by the way why do you think that SF will not be matched with VAC amplifier ? why do you think that the sound of them with those amplifiers will be a bit dark ?

@doni , I still didn't consider the wilson tunetots but i think i can hear them at my country so i will consider, thanks.

@charles1dad  to which different niches each of the speakers related to in you opinion ?

Again thanks to anyone who shared his/her opinion

@haimr,
My observation over the years. Magico versus Sonus Faber (SF).
Very often SF owners and reviewers describe them as utterly musical, natural/organic and emotionally involving (Pulls you into the music).

Magico owners and most reviewers describe them as neutral, clear, detailed and accurate. Quite distinct adjectives used between the 2 brands. Thus my contention these brands attract (Generally) different types of listeners.

Example daveyf has SF Guarmeri Homage driven by Jadis class A mono blocks. 
Very different from Magico driven by Soloution amplifiers.  Very different sonic presentations. 
Charles 

The Sonus Fabers aren't as bright as the Magicos.  Lovely speaker but when driven by a warmer tube amp like that VAC, I worry that it may drift warm to dark.  If that is your preferred sound, cool.  If not, be aware it is a risk.  

The Jadis mentioned are KT120 and tend to be more neutral like ARC.  VAC is a warmer brand.  That is my only caution

The point that the SF's aren't as bright as the Magico's is spot on IMO. The Magico's can sound bright if mixed with the wrong ancillary gear.
But to be clear, I very much enjoy the sound of Magico's...and I think their line is quite fine. Having said that, i don't think the lower models are anywhere near as great as the models from say the A5 on up. The A1 and A3 are not that impressive to me. SF has changed their basic sound since Franco left the company, it is now more of the middle of the road than it was before. Franco's designs tend to be, at least to my ears, almost unbeatable. Yet, they can tip to the warm sound of the spectrum...again with gear that tends to lean that way. Magico's can never be said to be too warm! Since the SF's that I use are fronted either by a ss amp or by the aforementioned Jadis amps ( using KT150's and not KT120's) I think they are a very simpatico combo. Magico and Soulution are an interesting match up. I like the sound and I like the neutrality and detail...but I dont like the ease that the tweeter gets hot. 
Probably an ideal tweeter, and this is one that I think is pretty close to SOTA, is the YG billet dome..very impressive...and the best of both worlds, IMO.

The point that the SF's aren't as bright as the Magico's is spot on IMO.

Not true in this case. The SF are substantially brighter. You can argue with the HFN lab report if you wish.