I own both amps and the RB 1090 is far superior when driving my JBL 4430's, but the B&W 803D's prefer the RB 1092. I also have the RB1091's on the B&W's and can't tell a difference, so much for the mono blocks vs Stereo Amps argument for Rotel. The 803D's sound very clean, but they need an additional sub to enhance the full spectrum for the room, where the JBL's do it all with the 1090. I've played with other amps trying to find which amp works best with my speakers, but given my limited budget I can only go so far. The Sunfire Signature 600 Two didn't come close to the RB 1090, but sounded better than the class D amps on the 4430's. I also tried a Bryston 3 BST, but didn't care for it, either. I don't know if this helps anyone or not, but I prefer the sound of the RB1090 over the RB1092.
Rotel Rb 1090 or Rb 1092
I currently use a Rotel rc-1090 pre amp and Anthem MCA 2 200wpc Amp with Paradigm Studio 100v3 speakers. I am looking to upgrade my AMP because 200wpc just is not cutting it in the lower end with these speakers. My question is will a Rotel RB-1090 or a Rotel RB-1092 class D be a better chioce. I have gotten two different opinions from dealers. I listen to mostly 70's and 80's rock and am looking for better kick in the bass area. I see a few used in both for sale but looking for some of your opinions to help with my dilema.