I think I've made up my mind


After having auditioned the following :

1. Avantgarde Uno G2 + Audio Note SET amp/Pathos Twin Towers integrated amp
2. Magico V2 + Soulution 720 pre + 710 power amps
3. Sonus Faber Elipsa/Wilson Sasha + ARC Ref 3 + Ref 110
4. Thiel CS3.7 + Parasound JC1 pre + JC2 power amps

...and after weighing all factors like room interaction, degree of difficulty of setting-up, value for money, magazine reviews, and comments posted here and AVguide.com....

...the winner is: Thiel CS3.7 + Parasound JC1/JC2!

Now for the cables. MF and JA of Stereophile noted that the specs of Parasound show ultra-wide bandwidth and high-current capability which reminds me of Spectral amps. Therefore, would MIT Magnum MA speaker cables and interconnects be a good match? Anyone has any other suggestion? Thanks.
jtein

Showing 7 responses by mapman

All very good stuff. Looks like you considered a nice variety of system types before deciding, which is very smart.

Two things worth considering I might add:

1) A tube pre-amp might work very well with that amp!

2) Did you consider OHM Walsh speakers by chance? Might be worth taking advantage of OHMs extensive in-house trial period first if you might be interested in perhaps halving or better the cost for the speakers, depending on room size. Sound should compete well with the Thiels I would think however styling and appearance is way different.
Tvad,

The match may be within range but 30K ohm is still towards the low end of the SS amp input impedance range from what I've seen, which seems to be around 10K ohm. I've seen balanced input impedances on SS amps up to 200K ohms or so.
Tvad,

I think I recall you indicating in prior discussions that you believe higher amp input impedance generally leads to directly observable improved bass performance, or something to that effect, which technically sounds viable to me.

In that case, 30K ohms is a lot closer to the low end for SS amps I have seen (about 10K ohms) than it is the max I have seen (about 200K ohm balanced).

It would be more of a factor for higher output impedance tube pre-amps than lower impedance SS pre-amps.
"Nevertheless, if you have specific numbers that would suggest a non-optimal match, then I'd be interested in seeing them and learning more."

No.

I'm only suggesting (as unless I'm mistaken I recall you have suggested to others as well in past threads) that if what you heard was not good, and a tube pre-amp was used, an amp with 60K, 100K, or 200K input impedance would probably sound different and might sound better than one with 30K input impedance, all other factors aside.
Tvad,

Understood.

My recent move from an amp with 62K input impedance (Musical Fidelity A3CR) to one with a 100K input impedance (BC ref1000mkii) produced a difference in sound of the type and magnitude that would seem to support this theory and the physics behind the theory makes sense to me.


That's not to say that such a change in a single spec assures better sound, but the effects may be somewhat predictable in the case of impedance matching when heard I believe, which is of benefit.

The change in sound in my case was a marginal but noticeable improvement in overall clarity, dynamics and detail. That is pretty much what I was looking for in going to a SS amp (class D in this case) with higher than average input impedance specs that appeared to be a safer if not necessarily better match with a tube pre-amp.

Whether the resulting sound is better or not is always a matter of taste and preference and other technical factors as well. Specs are a guideline to better sound perhaps in some cases (like impedance matching) but only tell part of the story.

I think one of Bel canto's rationals for the design of the mkii version of the Ref 1000s was to help assure an optimal match with more pre-amps, tube pre-amps in particular. The input impedance was raised from standard IcePower 10K input impedance in the original ref1000s to 100K (unbalanced)in the newer mkii versions, which is largely why I sprung for the much more expensive mkiis over the originals, to help assure optimal results with the ARC sp16 pre-amp in my system.
Pubul57,

Some (like ARC in their SS amps) and others do provide that.

Some do not.

Hopefully someone knowledgeable in SS amp design can chirp in and clarify what the tradeoffs are.

I guessing it has something to do with what is required to deal with distortion cost effectively then in the amp itself (negative feedback , etc.) in conjunction with driving lower impedance speakers effectively as well.

And/Or it might be that certain amps go for a certain type of sound that can be achieved more consistently with lower input impedance and a SS pre-amp.

I suspect part of the bottom line is just that no two amps work exactly the same way and synergy among components (pre-amp on one side and speakers on the other) then is always key as a result.
Al,

Do you think the reason companies like ARC and some others (like Bel Canto with the Ref10000 mkiis specifically) design SS amps with 100K input impedance or higher is to help assure that they work well also with the largest # of tube pre-amps possible?

Other tube pre-amps may have significantly higher output impedances at certain frequencies than either the ref 3 or sp 16 specifically and the high input impedance could help there, correct?

Plus also, who's to say how accurate published specs are or that specific units operate to spec? The higher input impedance might be regarded as something of an insurance policy perhaps even in cases where on paper everything looks good, don't you think?