The chart in the pictures of this listing shows the Glanz MFG 610lx, one step below the Glanz 71l
https://www.classicaudio.fi/product/glanz-mfg-610lx/76/
GLANZ MFG 610LX
The chart in the pictures of this listing shows the Glanz MFG 610lx, one step below the Glanz 71l https://www.classicaudio.fi/product/glanz-mfg-610lx/76/ |
Chakster, I have never heard the Glanz Cartridges in question, so I am going from the chart I provided. The 71l has a slightly higher channel separation than the 610lx, which normally dictates the better cartridge. Also Frequency response deviation is tighter on the 71l versus the 610lx They both show to have the same solid diamond line contact stylus. I wish we could see the rest of the chart. I was wondering where did you learned the MFG 71L was aluminum and the 610lx was boron? Could they have been modified? Anyway, I am sure both are great, just found that chart and wanted to add it to the conversation, so we might get some of this convoluted Glanz/Astatic information correct before we die and our wives through them out. :) |