Feickert analogue protractor....Owners impressions


I'm contemplating the purchase of this brand of protractor.

Over the years I have relied on a good friend to mount cartridges and set up the few tables that I have owned in the past.
Relying on someone else to do this was for good reason.

I would never make it as a watch maker or any other profession that requires a fine touch and skill with steady hands.
The time has come where I will have to do this totally on my own.

My question to you owners of the Feickert protractor is what is your experience with it regarding ease of use and accuracy compared to other protractors?

Secondly, the disk has strobe markings for speed set up, does the Feickert package come with a strobe light for the $250. selling price?

I asked these question of a dealer sent via a e-mail and have not received a reply as of yet.

Thank you for your replies.
stiltskin

Showing 4 responses by jfd01

Tvad,
Order for two 10X loupes is done. Please contact me by email with details about where to send you yours when I receive it. Thanks.
Cheers,
Joel
Very interesting thread.
I just emailed to order a MintLP too... Tvad, I'll see if I can get you a 10X loupe. Will let you know.
Cheers.
I wonder if any of you out there with a Galibier/Tri-Planar VII (you know who you are...) and the Feickert have ever noticed this strange problem?
When I measure the pivot-spindle distance with the Feickert, I find 232.5 mm. Thom's protractor indicates a distance of 233.5 mm, which seems confirmed even by my clumsy measurement with a ruler. Has anybody else tried to double-check the result of the Feickert with a ruler?
Thanks.
Cheers.
Since I received my MintLP last week, I'll add my 2 cents to this discussion of the MintLP.
I was previously using Thom Makris' protractor (which is based on the same arc system as the MintLP). It turns out that, because of the much finer line of the MintLP, I discovered that I was slightly off at the null point, whereas it seemed right on the line with Thom's; likely because the line of his protractor is slightly larger than on the MintLP.
I don't have any experience with the Wally, but from my experience, comparing the MintLP with the Rega or other paper protractors (I've used a few if those in the past) is perhaps misleading, because the lines are quite a bit thicker than the MintLP.

On the point of the 10x loupe: it's very hard to use, specially if you don't have much clearance for the stylus (yes, with the Dynavector it must be quite easier, but with my Zyx Airy 3, it's tricky), but it's actually possible. It took me quite a long time to finally "see" the stylus/cantilever when doing the alignment, but it was so much more precise than the 5x magnifying glass. A bit nerve-racking too, because you have to get the loupe very close to the cartridge body...

And, yes it sounded better after all that work...
Cheers.