In pursuit of the golden ear.

Get yourself a good piano or a guitar. Learn to play it. Also place it in a controlled enviroment like they would in a studio. If you know the instrument then you can ceratainly judge recordings and gear accordingly. That is how I do it... I play piano and guitar and know both instruments inside-out. I can immediatly tell you if there is the slightest flutter on i.e. a piano recording...

You have to know live music to judge equipment and albums...

Best of luck,
Dewald Visser

I don't really think of it as having a "Golden Ear." About two years ago my system, which I got in 1987, became less and less satisfying. I started a search for a system that "scratched my itch." Some of the first systems I listened to seemed dull and lifeless. Another system I listened to at a high end place in New York City had components in which the highs seemed somewhat strident and the lows were almost absent. I went to second place. They had a system that seemed the fulfillment of all my fantasies. From top to bottom the sound was there. Transients were crisp. The overall impression was of almost being there at the performance. (I say almost, because there is no system that can completely capture everything in a live orchestral performance). After listening to several CDs, my overall impression was that everything sounded "natural."

About a year ago I came across the question, "What is the best indicator of a great high end system?" The response: "There is lots of air around the performers and instruments."

From my experience, I would say forget about the "highs" and "lows." I would use the following tests: 1) Does the music sound natural? 2) Does the music sound alive? 3) Is there plenty of air around the performers? 4) Is there is sense of a wide and deep soundstage before you? (Not appropriate question if your're listening to soloists or a small ensemble) 5) As you listen, do you feel you are in audio Nirvana? If you can say "yes" a lot, then you are in the right neighborhood.

Greetings,

I used to ponder the same question.

It all boils down to what audio equipment you've heard, and your ability to accurately analyze what you're hearing.

This evelution can be a doubled edge sword.

For example, there have been many times when I felt my system sounded as good as it possibly could.

Then I acquire a new piece of equipment that ellevates things to a whole new level and I couldn't immagine listening ever again without that piece equipment.

It's very difficult to know what your missing and the weaknesses in your system until you hear something better.

Hence the double edge sword because this can get quite expensive.

Once you go down this road, having a fair amount of disposable income would problably help the situation.

It seams many audiophiles become bitter or go into denial, when they figure out just how much it usually takes to achieve the higher levels of audio playback available today.

Unfortunately, spending a tone of money doesn't alway get you there.

One recent example I experienced was with my headphones.

I had been using Sennheiser 650s which I thought sounded about as good as any headphone possibly could, and I really enjoyed listening to them.

Then along comes the new AKG 701s, which everyone is proclaiming as the new BEST headphone. So I get a pair and low and behold, they were right.

The 701s blow the 650s away in every catagory. After listening to the 701s I can't understand how I could have ever tolerated the 650s, they just sound terrible compaired to the 701s.

If you haven't had this kind of experience yet, once you do, you'll fully understand to answer to your question.

first of all you have to have a collection of very good recorded medias.
if it's not recorded good than don't listen even if ya realy like it...

Thanks for all the comments, there's alot of good practical suggestions here to apply and ponder on.