Why not cryo AFTER break in of product?


I was wondering if greater cryo benefits might be achieved if the process' results was not "at odds" with the future break in characteristics of the product. Personally, I've had no experience yet with the cryo process let alone any A/B testing.
vonhakemarine
Rcrerar are implying that break-in does not effect the molecular level of the conductor?
The two words might sound the same, but how does bending a cable affect -- or break -- the molecular structures in a cable? I was under the impression that cryo treatment does not mean making "crystaline" ice cubes in the cable that they could be broken by moving it, rather it changes the molecular properties of the material itself. I don't get it, please explain.

Also, any audio manufacturer inevitably sends their cables to a cryo treatment firm, unpacks, puts it in the freezer unit with a bunch of other stuff, takes it out, packs, ships it back, gets handled and repacked, shipped to you. Then you straighten the cables, hook it up, adjust your speakers here and there over the lifetime of the cables, maybe A/B a couple of them. That makes cryo kind of useless, if it's true: set it in there, leave it alone (since by the time you compare before and after, cryo has lost its benefits).
Obviously you have to ship your entire rack, complete, to the Cryo Lab, have them dunk the entire stack; rack, cones, components and all, then ship it home without budging a thing, you'd be in seventh heaven.

Wonder if someone could to on-site Cryo?

Stanley Steemer in a Liquid Nitrogen truck...do the whole darn listening room, even the windows and Room Tunes.
Exceptional idea.Might as well throw on a pallet of oxygen bottles on the truck for the boomers who are needing them as we speak,cheers,Bob