EMM Labs CDSD / DCC2 - Initial Listening Session


With only 48 hours of burn-in on these pieces, this review is hardly definitive- but here goes...

I think old Ed (Meitner) has hit the cover off the ball with this, his latest offering in CD/SACD playback equipment. The following comments are based on comparisons to my previous front-end: Meitnerized Philips SACD 1000, Meitner DAC6, Meitner Switchman II and apply to both SACD & CD playback.

The CDSD & DCC2 - compared to the previous Meitner rig---

-Much deeper soundstage, much more layered, as well, width about the same.
-Hall ambiance retrieval is vastly superior.
-Tonal and timbral qualities are unsurpassed in any digital gear I've experienced. Piano reproduction is absolutely stunningly good!! Acoustic guitar has the string interaction/wooden resonance of the real thing.
-There is a "Bloom" to instuments, even voice, that seems typically absent in digital playback. This quality is very "Analog" like.
-So far, I sense not even a suggestion of stridency or digital fatigue- It is just not there. This new gear is just plain musical. That word is overused- but there is no other word to better describe the overall experience. There is a natural seamlessness and natural bloom to the music, as a whole, which reminds me of a live performance within a live venue. All of the elements of that live experience seem reproduced faithfully by the CDSD & DCC2. This is no small feat. In quantitative terms I'd say the new gear is 25%-35% better, in every listening category (it is about the same in soudstage width), than the earlier 3 piece set-up I had.

As the new gear continues to burn-in there will certainly be changes and refinements, probably for the better, which I will try to keep track of. But so far- Ooh, La, La!!!

ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT:
Kharma Midi Grand
Tenor 300 HP
Jena Labs Pathfinder
Shunyata Anaconda VX & VX Alpha
fbhifi
Have any of you guys done some comparative listening of the EMM combo with the Teac Esoteric X-01? Have not listened to EMM yet, but have listened both to X-01 and to the Esoteric P70/D70 combo, and found both astonishingly good.
In the meantime, my own findings on X-01 are in the following thread:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?ddgtl&1090867688&read&keyw&zzemm
The thread also contains an excellent discussion by MGOTTLIEB, who appears to give the preference to X-01 in his comparison with EMM, and has since purchased the Esoteric unit. For redbook at least, he uses it mostly as a transport, augmented by DCS Elgar + Purcell.
Just listened to the LAGQ ALBUM of covers with full meitner equipment used to record it.Most nauseatingly clinical sounding guitar album I have heard in a very long time.YMMV.
Brucegel- Which LAGQ album are you referring too? Guitar Legands or Latin? I must admit I was very let down with the sonics of Latin and haven't bothered trying Guitar Legends. What equipment was used during production is interesting but- IMO- often has little to do with the end project. If you have someone over mixing/dubbing/sampling/whatevering they can ruin a great performance no matter what gear they are using.
Well I tried the manhattan transfers album vibrate and the list of mics used is kick-ass and they used millenia pres and meitner gear and once again the sound is plasticky and has the emm tonal touch of glass to every frequency I can pin point.I would be shocked if this is the adopted choice of recording in the future.