Linn Ikemi vs. Electro. EMC1 vs. 508.24


These three players are all priced about the same on the used market. Has anyone had any experience comparing the three players. I am considering upgrading my CD. Current system includes Plinius 8150, B&W 803s. I listen to jazz, classical, some rock. Small listening room. Thanks, Joel
joeldoss
You are on crack...please only post your opinions once...not multiple times. It seems that you have an agenda.

The EMC1 is the best player in this bunch. The reason so many are for sale (5 at this time) is due to the fact that there is a new version coming soon. The new version will have a 192 Dac.

The EMC1 is the best digital I have ever heard with perhaps the exception of the DCS and other MEGABUCK 24-192 KHZ DACs.
If you can get this player for under 2.5K it is a steal. Buy the player than decide if you want to upgrade it for 1-1.5K when the upgrade kit is made available.

The other two players are fine kit but to my ears the EMC1 is an outstanding player and it looks very cool to boot.
Thanks a lot Celery, well said.
The Meridian sounded like an old CD player (and it is) compared to the EMC-1.
Well the Linn is a tinker toy. The Meridian, while a decent unit is a bit bland and soft int he bass and not very extended in the treble. The EMC-1 which I not only bought to replace the 508.24, is leagues ahead of the Meridian. To the fellow who went to Sounds by Singer with his 508.24, please come to the Brooklyn Bridge to my dealership at Audio Visionary (718) 694-9770 with youplayer and we will give you all the time you need to compare the players. You need about 30-45 minutes to warm up a CD player, but the sound changes very little. The EMC-1 has only been in production for 24 months and is of such higher build and sound quality than these other players and those in and above its price point. The Linn CD 12 bests it is some ways, but at 5x the price. There have been players onthe market because soem people erroneously thought that the new upsampling Mk. II version is not going to be achieved through an upgrade. Considering it takes 300 hours for initial break in and 1000 hours for complete break-in of the transport mechanism, why one would swap out an old player and buy a new one I have no idea--call it audio nervousa. We also sell the Sim Eclipse and even there, I prefer the EMC-1. Some may like the Eclipse for its bass slam, but that is a taste issue, not necessarily one of accuracy. The new Mk. II is leagues ahead. please folks if you want to upgrade your EMC-1 give us a call, it is breathtaking. Oh, also to the fellow who said when the EMC-1 is on Stereophile and the British rags top componenets list, um, do you see how much Meridian spends in advertising with them? The EMC-1 has never been review there, but it hasd all over the world and also in the Absolute Sound--in a system review that was poorly written and in Ultimate Audio. The fact is that EC has struggled to produce the players ahead of demand. And EC is a $10-15MM company, not a $50MM company like Meridian. If you ahve not heard the EMC-1 comee listen for a real treat. If you have not heard it then please don't toss an uninformed opinion around. And as for Accuphase, well they have always sounded transparent, but s bit clinical to my ears, and hideously expensive for what they produce in digital and solid state gear.
The 508.24 is a good cdp that is detailed and has good lows, however the sound is processed in a very clinical (digital) way and the model is outdated. The EMC-1 is a very analog sounding player with extremely good mid's and is a 24/96 player. More work is needed with the EMC-1 since the transport is very sensitive. In my opinion, the EMC-1 is more sophiscated and a superior unit that the Meridian 508.24. I have not heard the Linn Ikemi.