Advice on cartridges!

Just to elaborate on the previous post, it's more the structural rigidity of an arm vs. its mass per se that makes for better compatibility with MC carts - due their more 'sensitive' motor assembly and suspensions. MCs put a lot of energy back into the arm, so closer tolerances allow better "handling" (if you will) and less "wiggle" at the stylus/groove interface (as I understand it) I say that if your budget (and preamp) allows it, go fer 'da low output coil! Again, depending on your budget, something like a Koetsu or Allaerts would really *shine* on a rig as nice as yours! -John

For what it is worth, who ever Musikdok is has said exactly what I would advise, in every way. Readers here know I am an analog addict, and my experience with the Dyanvector arm, Dynavector cartridge, the Benz line, Koetsu and (listening, but to owning) experience with the Sumiko, confirms what has already been posted. The only other comment would be that I think that even the new Benz Glider (very reasonably priced!) is a better choice than the Sumiko. Best wishes!

It is the compliance of the cartridge not the weight that dictates the use of a higher or lower mass arm. The objective is to place the low frequency resonance of the assembly above typical record warp and eccentricity of 7 - 8 Hz, therefore about 10 - 12 Hz. Resonance is a function of cartridge compliance and arm mass. This relationship has been charted for audiophile convenience but I can't find mine (several cleanings and moves) so I can't quote example numbers at the moment. General rule is high compliance / lower mass arm, low compliance / higher mass arm. I like the Dynavector high output moving coils - have a 20A and have used 10X4 (both older versions). I see DV now has a newer 20 model in both high and low output versions which may be worthy of your consideration. Both (older) are very detailed but the 20 is less "hard" in your terms. I am not familiar with the DV arm. Good luck with your choices.