The Love of Turntables and The Organization Of An Audio Room


This is an area that has been a challenge for me, stretching over a number of years. Well specifically since we moved to this house about 10 years ago. My listening room is our closed off living room, and its primary purpose is music but we do have friends over occasionally. If you can limit your number of friends in your life, then this becomes a somewhat minor problem.

My system is somewhat complicated, and there are a number of boxes. My real dilemma is turntables. I love them. I try to limit myself to two, but I have not been successful. Currently have four. Well 3.5 as one needs a tonearm and cartridge. The third turntable becomes problematic because if I put it on my credenza, then I do not have a space to reach over the back to get to cabling and pre amp or phono stage. When things are neat and tidy it looks like this

But it is on the verge of getting out of control

Sometimes I envy those folks who can be content with one turntable. The black table with the DP80 on it will never leave because the plinth was machined by my son. But sometimes I do wonder if I sold all the others and combined things to one upper tier table, what could I have? But conversely I really wonder if my system and room could really show the benefits of the next tier of record spinner.

neonknight

Less is more in my estimation. Having a big dedicated room helps. But there is an aesthetic to this that may be in conflict with gear-headedness and clutter. To me, interior design is a very personal reflection and I don’t mean that in terms of Architectural Digest type layouts-some people hire decorators and their rooms (not necessarily audio centered) have all the charm of a 4 Seasons hotel room.

I decluttered a couple days ago because I’m an accumulator-- spare tubes, phono front end tools, I like books and instruments and good rugs. But, I’m leaning towards "spare" - more space, fewer objects. I get the question I think the answer depends on you, no?

PS: I didn't focus exclusively on the turntable issue but I think that is partly a question of having space (big room) and layout--easy to access and not looking cluttered? I find cluttered spaces to be almost claustrophobic but again, it comes back to an aesthetic thing in my estimation, not entirely driven by ease of access and operation of gear.

I love turntables as well and would probably own more than one if I had the space. As it is, I've shoehorned my audio system into a relatively small spare bedroom that also doubles as my photography studio. It works, but just barely. Still, I'm thankful to have a system at all after losing my previous dedicated listening room to a whole-home renovation ten years ago (happy wife...).

This time around, I vowed to keep things super simple: a turntable, an integrated amplifier with an internal phono stage, and a pair of stand-mounted loudspeakers. I don't know whether it's simply the joy of having a system again or the dumb luck of component synergy, but the quality of sound I'm getting now seems leaps and bounds better than before - and this system cost about one-third as much as my previous setup.

So I'm happy. But at the first opportunity, I'm going shopping for a second turntable smiley 

@neonknight You are not going to get any help from me AT ALL!  Quite simply the very idea that it is even remotely possible to have too many turntables is an oxymoron in my book.  Carry on and keep up the good work!  I would encourage you to consider my rule of thumb:  Whenever possible it is optimal to limit your self to one tonearm per turntable.  So, one for each: Stereo (mm), mono (mm); stereo (mc), mono (mc).  Then there is DD and BD to add variety, linear tracking.  Different arms of different lengths.  We are working on a second house now to accommodate, but I don't recommend that, traveling back and forth is getting to be a hassle.  Anyway, it is a form of dementia.  It takes one to know one. ;-)  The important thing is to have fun.