And yet have you done any listening? If we haven’t done any listening, then we should probably shut the F up until we do.
If I were you, I would take it easy with the profanity and taking things too personally. That is uncalled for on an adult-only forum. We are not high school students, so please act your age.
To answer your question, I have not heard this specific ethernet cable.
However, I have experience with CCIE level knowledge regarding computer networking, since my son is a network engineer.
To me, it seems a bit irrational that you are challenging the beliefs of someone whose job it was to maintain quality control and manufacturing standards over numerous sites around the world, among many other roles that were extremely challenging such that those before me were getting fired; while I marched on and eventually retired at will when I wanted to.
You are welcome to pick up a computer networking textbook (Cisco is my favorite and probably the best) and read about the OSI model, TCP/IP, and ask an AI agent such as ChatGPT specific questions about the cable making a difference in your audio system.
As I had already stated previously,
The master clock (crystal oscillator that controls timing) is already doing the heavy lifting for incoming signals. Audio equipment is not adverse to ethernet, and hence the engineers who designed the audio components you are using must have built them competently and professionally.
The solution would be to find a double-shielded ethernet cable of considerable build quality and compare it directly with the ethernet cable from this company. Level match and write down your impressions on a notepad. Separate pages, different days. Let’s see what the results are.
I am not one for brand loyalty or clinging to a certain product line unless the results are consistent and repeatable. If that cannot be proven, there is no basis for claims that such a product is superior for an intended purpose.
Peace.

