Calling All Tube Gurus, Poll:Capacitor Rolling vs Tube Rolling


For those who have done both,which one was more impactful and which one provided the better return on investment?  

Thanks in advance for your thoughtful input.

 

mustagefan

With higher level equipment I wouldn't touch anything but tubes. And with lower level equipment - I don't want it, anyway.

Caps can make a significant difference. As with tubes the improvement heard is based as much on what was in the component before the change as any other factor. Tubes are very easy and thus make more sense. The best bang for the buck I have found are certain Jupiter caps. My least favorite caps of note and they came stock on my amps are the expensive teflon V-caps. They are still changing a bit after 300 to 350 hours. 

When voicing the Custom Designed and Built for myself Phonostage, all initial experiences was undertaken with a measured set of modern production tubes used as the constant.

Cap’s and Resistors were exchanged to see what was to be achieved for the voicing. After a selection of exchanges not cheap as tolerance across channels resulted in discards ( or more outlay to acquire components to test for closeness), the outcome was, a End Sound was developed that really was attractive to myself. The designer/builder also had a rethink on the component selection for their own model of the Phon’.

At a later time after a good few hours of usage, a tube rolling session occurred using a broad range of Valves from production era’s from the early 60’s to nearer the millennium year.

Valves used to roll were supplied with a near perfect matched A/B Half on each Valve and Paired Valves were almost measuring identical as well.

The learning had on the tube rolling occasions, was a substantial learning and a tube selected as a result of being loaned a broad valve range was a choice never considered to change. The prior to tube rolling voicing with components was equally beneficial to the End Sound that become available.