@audphile1 I have tried all the different ways to stream, so many dacs, streamers, streaming apps, roon, what I am doing now with my setup is totally amazing. I wish everyone could come by and listen. What I have now it would be hard to audition, I stumbled on it by accident. After 50 years with systems what I have now beats all them hands down, makes me think back to the 70s when my father inlaw took me to the Phase Linear factory and we picked out a preamp and amp being he knew Mr. Carver, I was into JBL and Klipsch back then which followed me in my tube amp period, that’s how I stumbled on Volti Audio. To make this post not so long, the Meitner MA3i, to the Pass Labs XA-25 amp to the Volti Lucera speakers are superior sounding to anything I have listened to in my lifetime. The Meinter to Qobuz connect is the way to go with my system.
Does anyone have a digital system that is as involving as their analogue front end?
I have a good analogue front end. Not stratuspherically good but good enough for this comparison. VPI Prime Signature 21 turntable, Pass Labs XP-25 pono preamp, Pass Labs XP-30 preamp and Hovland Radia amp. It has a lovely, very involving sound. On the right recording, I just drop everythng and am drawn in to listen.
My streamer, on the other hand, is decent but not spectacular. It is better than my CD player, but it is not jaw-dropping like my analogue front-end. My question is this: does anyone have a high-end, tier-one streamer (dCS Bartok Apex, Lumin X2, or something like them) that can rival a good analogue system?
- ...
- 284 posts total
It isn’t very difficult to install a 500 dollar software on a mac, run your dac into it and have the sound of analog master tape forever. If that’s too difficult, you could always get the Daniel Hertz Maria amp (a bit more cost). It is a streamer+dac+preamp+amp all in one box with the same technology built in and you shall have the sound of pristine analog master tape from anything digital. And then, we shall hold hands at the top of the hill and look down upon the masses fumbling in darkness..cursing at their cartridges, washing their vinyl records in the bathtub everyday, praying to their phonostages, etc.. hoping for some miracle. As an added bonus, you can sell your turntable, cartridge, phono preamp, vinyl records, etc and make a lot of your money back. The music library shall expand from 3 great pressings on repeat all year (or else everything falls apart) to thousands of albums. You may finally experience all kinds of artists you’ve never heard of. Above mentioned solution is just for guys chasing analog sound with their digital rigs because some turntable sales guy fooled ’em into thinking analog sound is the holy grail of sound. It’s a great lie. Well executed digital sound is its own flavor, that can stand on its own pedestal. If you also truly appreciate well executed digital sound...which you should... you should keep a nice separate digital chain as well. The Daniel Hertz digital processing is just for the master tape analog sound and to get saved from all this expensive analog hardware foolery. Turntables and records are just too sloppy and handicapped. @maprik wrote
|
A slightly longer no, this time. I have spent a lot of time recently rearranging my network to get the best digital sound that I can. This has reduced the nasties in digital significantly. I have listened to a few high res albums and am delighted how loud I can now go with being fatigued by what I am hearing. The last digital album I listened to all the way through was Caravanserai by Santana. Now, I have swapped to vinyl for then same album. It is a completely different level of listening experience, more involving, immersive, realistic and enjoyable. Better in every way possible, bar a little surface noise in the quiet parts. It isn’t even close. I should declare the I have currently got Linn’s new dual Utopik Klimax Radikal on loan, so I won’t be at these giddy heights after I return it on Monday. Maybe, I am doing something wrong with digital, but that’s the way I’m hearing it. |
@audio-b-dog I used to have an analog system as well as digital and made the decision to focus on one path. It's never apples to apples but I have heard some very high end analog systems that are great but also digital systems that, at least to me, are comparable. This, along with the convenience and essentially endless library of new music caused me to choose digital. Dollars certainly do not always correlate to great sound and I have friends that probably have at least equal sound quality systems and have made better financial choices! |
You are repeating a prejudice about ageing. We all lose our ability to hear high frequencies with age. This does not affect our appreciation of music per se because that is dependent on our ability to distinguish tiny timing differences between harmonics. Our ability to hear these timing differences does not necessarily deteriorate with age to the same extent as with high frequencies. You are slandering Michael Fremer along with all older people.
|
- 284 posts total

