Sonic correlations with art in the listening space


I’ve been doing some serious listening room optimization lately and wanted to share some findings that I think will genuinely move the needle for people.

I started with a Van Gogh Starry Night print on the front wall. The effect was immediately apparent — the soundstage became more active and forward, treble took on an aggressive, almost agitated quality, and there was a swirling, turbulent energy in the upper midrange that I can only describe as "post-impressionistic." Bass was present but restless. Not unpleasant, but fatiguing over long sessions.

I swapped in a Monet Water Lilies — same frame, same wall position, same listening chair. The transformation was remarkable. Highs rolled off beautifully, the whole presentation became more diffuse and liquid, with a kind of shimmering quality in the upper frequencies that never hardened. Soundstage depth increased noticeably. Jazz and classical particularly benefited. Vocals floated with an almost pond-like serenity.

I’m currently experimenting with a Rothko — early results suggest a warm, enveloping midrange with somewhat ill-defined edges, though the color temperature of the piece may be a confounding variable. A Mondrian is on order and I’m expecting tight, articulate bass with excellent channel separation.

Has anyone else explored this? I feel like the art/acoustics interaction is seriously underexplored in this hobby. Would love to hear other findings. Measurements welcome but I’m not sure the Klippel can capture this yet.

P.S. But seriously – I AM curious about the effect of decor on your overall listening experiences. I am making a joke above, but I do spend time tweaking my lighting and other things and seeing how impacts of visual art on mood effect listening experience.


hilde45

But if you listen on really good headphones, they of themselves, in a "pure direct" mode, should have no sound "to sound like the system you listen to it through" and therefore only reproduce what is fed to them without adding their own coloration.

I never listen to YouTube over my living room system but rather my near field monitors in my office because they are largely unaffected by the room in which they are used.  If I listened over my living room system, everything would take on the characteristics of my room/system.

But if you listen on really good headphones, they of themselves, in a "pure direct" mode, should have no sound "to sound like the system you listen to it through" and therefore only reproduce what is fed to them without adding their own coloration.

I get it now.  I use the same logic to taste different cuts of beef! I use a very pure ketchup, one that adds no coloration of its own, and I can reliably distinguish a dry-aged ribeye from a grass-fed sirloin from a supermarket chuck roast. The ketchup is neutral and reproduces only what the beef gives it, without imposing its own character. 

The next time you're considering different cuts of beef -- or really any other food -- I suggest you put ketchup on it first. It really clarifies what things really taste like.

My listening room art work is almost all canvas that I packed the backs off with insulation to create cheap sound panels. It works for me, and still looks good. 

For my room, weirdly, adding a lot of plants helped the sound. I do have a couple big ones in 30g pots.

I hung a Willem de Kooning on the wall between the speakers and my soundstage became ferocious, distorted, and abstracted.