@hilde48 — To me, measurements are a big part of the story, but only in service of “which sounds better.” Fancy measuring systems can only take you so far. Sound preferences vary, and listening tests have their problems. But that is another discussion!
I’m sure you are aware of Ron Bernay and his sound shed, designed and equipped for controlled listening comparisons. If the parties involved were willing to provide Ron with 2 sets of speakers, original and modified, we could get a better take on the sonic comparison. However, they would need to commit considerable time and resources, and I don’t know how high a priority this would have.
Amir’s distortion and off-axis measurements were on version 1. Danny showed distortion in his second video, and it was far lower than what Amir showed. Danny’s final off-axis measurements were virtually identical to the original. Amir, at least twice, said the measurements were “off the charts.” He could have done what Danny did and adjusted the range on his charts.
I admit to a bias, but I would expect Danny’s modifications — crossover, tube connectors, and no-res damping, would result in noticeably better sound stage and imaging. Whether they would be more pleasing and engaging is another question.

