@faustuss
Re your comment that Finite Element Analysis is
just CAD with some proprietary modules
That’s like saying word processing and spreadsheets are the same because Word and Excel are part of Office, or the differences between the Qu’ran and the Bible don’t matter because they are both books!
The Commodor(e), is that the one that was crash tested into a fixed barrier at 35 MPH and the whole structure collapsed from stem to stern?
I’ve not heard that story! The Holden Commodore VE and VF series, which were the Australian ones designed and built using CAD/CAM, were the biggest selling vehicle in Australia, and in their performance versions one of the world’s fastest 4-door cars. They were exported to the USA as police pursuit vehicles.
star shaped token ring topology
Token Ring was touted by IBM as an alternative to Ethernet. All audiophiles know the outcome of that little struggle. The idea is that you can only transmit if you have the magic token, which is passed from one device to the next in a ’ring’. Problem is that the token stops if a device drops out. Solution: have a central controller and make the ring star-shaped with the controller in the middle. But what happens if the controller fails? A contemporary quote went along the line "if Bell made the telephone network like an IBM network, everybody would have to hang up before you could add a subscriber".
Interestingly, the technology we were developing in very short time supplanted main frames all together and a lot of the companies that thrived in our area, Wang, Digital, Data General, Prime and others went out of business and startups in the main frame arena like Sequoya never had a chance.
Really! You are dreaming. Before the VAX (a minicomputer), computing was dominated by mainframes from IBM and the BUNCH - Burroughs, Univac, NCR, Control Data Corporation and Honeywell. The VAX success grew Digital into the second biggest computer company in the world. I had to wait 18 months to get mine. The boss of Data General is on record saying he was happy for his company to survive on the orders Digital could not fill!
The VAX architecture remained in production for an astonishing 23 years until supplanted by the 64-bit Alpha design. Digital found it easy to make slower versions of the original 11/780 but very hard to make one much faster. If they added boards, it slowed communication between the boards. The 11/780 was their main game for six years, an astounding time in computing. They did eventually produce the mainframe-class 6000 and 9000 models, but the real breakthrough in performance was the single-chip MicroVAX models. Some they speeded up simply by reducing the photolithography used to print the circuits on the chips, so the electrons had less distance to travel.
Meanwhile, the BUNCH was dying. I remember a full-page advert in the Australian newspaper urging VAX users to trade in against Control Data Corporation’s new Cyber series. I thought it was such a joke that I hung the ad in my office. But it turned out it was not a joke. I later met the guy behind the campaign, which he claimed was highly successful. They got two genuine enquiries wanting to buy traded-in VAXes. Control Data had realised the game was up, and were moving to hardware maintenance for VAX computers and needed spare parts!
By the way, the dreadful corporate history of British Leyland never involved nationalisation, although the government did briefly become the major shareholder with a controlling interest.
I was working in the steel industry and genuinely did get nationalised. 25% instant pay rise, too. Did not compete with becoming a ten pound pom though.