My point is subtler. When I’m actually listening, the supposed opposition between attending to acoustic properties and attending to music is false. I cannot attend carefully to musical meaning without attending — maybe not focally, but to some degree — to the acoustic phenomena that constitute it.
When I listen, sometimes the music is the focus and sometimes it’s the sound, but both are always there. The ability to control what is focal is an achievement of listening practice. The inability to control that is a kind of dysfunction that I often see audiophiles complain about.
these two articles describe well why you are right.music and sound are born from the physical vibrating sound source (voice or instrument or birds songs etc) and music and sound are felt in the body in a simillar way across cultures. Music/ sound gave us immediate access to the hidden qualities of the vibrating sound source , be it a fruit tap revealing that the fruit is ripe or not or the voice of another human beings or animals.
Bodily maps of musical sensations across cultures:
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2308859121
Timbral effects on consonance disentangle psychoacoustic mechanisms and suggest perceptual origins for musical scales
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45812-z
Because the tone and tuning of musical instruments has the power to manipulate our appreciation of harmony, new research shows,Pythagoras was wrong: There are no universal musical harmonies, study finds;
https://phys.org/news/2024-02-pythagoras-wrong-universal-musical-harmonies.html

