A Lesson Learned and The Value of a REALLY GOOD Digital Cable-TUBULUS!


While I've been SACD-centered lately (and rediscovering redbook) with a refurbished Marantz SA 1 player (which has truly been most enjoyable-I feel like a young audiophile again), I keep in mind that I have an Eversolo T8 streaming transport (that also delivers Hi Res downloads) hooked to a Denafrips Venus II 15th.  I was USB for years.  I even had it on this setup.  I tried I2S.  I heard lots of potential lurking under the surface.  Not wanting to dive into the deep end of the pool, I bought a DH Labs Silversonic 2.1 HDMI.  It is, in most ways, better than my other HDMI cable.  A videophile friend who cuts no corners brought over an Audioquest Thunderbird 48 HDMI cable.  I have to say that cable was pretty nice.  When he told me the price, I nearly spit out my coffee!  There was no denying that the improved noise management and highish silver content generated increased dimension, detail, textures, and frequency response along with a natural warmth when called for.  I liked it, however, comparing recording for recording, my hi-res download system still couldn't quite catch my SACD player.  

I have always known digital cables were important.  I've had expensive coaxial and USB cables from several companies.  Sometimes I swear they impact the sonics of a system more than interconnects do (but not speaker cables).  What happened next, I seriously didn't envision it.  I figured, "This should be an improvement, and for the price, it better be!", but it went beyond that.

Enter the Tubulus Concentus I2S digital cable.

I've had this burning in my system for a while, ever since the Audioquest Thunderbird experience.  This is where music servers, whatever they may be, are nice.  You can burn something in for hundreds of hours without mechanical wear, and that's what I've been doing.  The cable should have had some break-in already, because it's a used cable (following my cheapskate tendencies), but I don't know how much.  Cables settle into a system as well.  Used or not, you can't rush that one.  Currently, I'm at around 100 hours.  I do expect further changes.  

Let's say I find a company that offers DAC mods.  I then send in my DAC, and $800 later (I'm using the suggested retail price of the Tubulus), it returns with the sonic improvements I'm experiencing right now.  First of all, I'd think the guy was a genius.  Second, I would find the sonic improvements somewhat of a bargain for the asking price.  Yet, with a cable, it feels like highway robbery.  I just have to remember, we pay for the end result.  This end result is a bargain.  I hate to say that, but it is.

The increase in space, ambience (the tails of which fade into blackness), dynamics, control, definition (everywhere), the sense of being there, music that is separated from the speakers in a way that seems almost magical.  I couldn't believe it.  Yet, it does all of this with remarkable ease.  An absence of strain.  It just "happens".  

In the past, I tried DDCs with computers and noted an improvement.  That improvement failed to exist with the Eversolo T8 transport, which costs less than the DDC I was using!  It does a fine job.  This Tubulus Concentus I2S cable is doing what a $2200 DDC couldn't.  I can't deny it, I am impressed and at the same time left without an explanation.  What I can say is, NOW my hi-res downloads put up one heck of a fight against my SACD and my vinyl.  THAT shocked me.  Due to a digital cable.

I have degrees in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering.  My profession for many years has required the use of my Mechanical Engineering, but I apply my EE to audio constantly.  I designed and built (after saying I was going to do so for a very long time) a power conditioner that displaced everything I've ever used, some of which was well over $2K, with fewer filtered outlets.  There are frequencies causing junk in our AC.  By knowing them, filters can be built that eliminate this noise in stages.  This can be calculated, explained, and executed.  This digital cable... I am an EE who believes that cables sound differently, some better, some worse, and for many reasons.  We just can't entirely explain them.  I hear "they measure the same", yet I believe they measure differently, if we just knew what to measure and how to do it.  I can come up with a few explanations from the engineering world that could explain why the Tubulus Concentus does what it does; however, I will not torture you with those here.

All I can say is, lesson learned.  I have bought many expensive cables in my life.  I have become partial to Cardas.  Regarding digital cables, I've always been hesitant to go BIG because of digital's ever-changing standards.  My hi-res downloads appear to be the equal of SACD and the best vinyl editions I have; it's just that each format (the components used impact it as well) presents a different "take" on each recording. 

The Tubulus Consentus I2S digital cable is for me, a game-changer, and that's putting it lightly.

hifi1967

Thanks for sharing.  It makes sense to me that cables make a difference. Glad you found a good match for your system!

Thanks for your post. I am curious as to why, as an EE, you believe that the cable provides better sound. Not arguing with you that it does for you, I’d just like to get your opinion as someone with the proper education as to the science driving your better experience. Scientifically why do you think the Tubulis I2S is better than other I2S cables?

F@!k Grok. I replaced my 20-year old Nirvana Audio 75-ohm Digtal Interface cable with a Cerious Technologies Graphene Matrix Digital cable V2, and the musical image immediately and undeniably snapped into better focus and clarity. I believe it removed the slight smear you get when the time alignment of the information is just a bit off. And it wasn't like everything sounded fuzzy with the Nivana. I am a true believer in grapene technology, and the use of  CTGM power cables for my 3 components (Jay's Audio CDT2 mk3, LTA Aero DAC, and LTA Z10 integrated/headphone amp, plus CT Lumniscate balanced interconnects from DAC to amp has brought my sound to another level. I bought my first Audio system when I  was 16: A 50-watt per channel Pioneer SX-838 receiver, Dual 1229 turntable, and a used pair of JBL L88 speakers, and I was very happy with the sound. As life went on, i replaced the Dual TT with The AR Turntable introduced in the early 1980's. Still later, in a small house with a family that didn't share my enjoyment from Yes, Deep Purple, and Pink Floyd, I sold my infrequently used Von Schwekert standmounts and went headphones only. I spent several years with the legenary Sony M R-10 hesdphones, but sold them due to some hard times. I have rebooted with Dan Clark Audio Stealth closed-back headphones, and can honestly say that my music finally sounds the way I'd always imagined it could sound. As a finishing touch, I have just purchased 12 Halo-III tube dampers and 4 SupSonic Stabilizers from Herie's Audio Lab, which I have not yet installed, as I am waiting on the availability of an add-on shelf for my current Pangea Audio rack, which have not been shipping from China due to illegal tariffs imposed by one of stupidest men to walk this planet. The additional shelf, which is needed for the external Linear Power Supply that LTA provided when they brought my bought-used Z-10 up to their latest spec, should arrive on June, at which time I will need to clear the rack and clean all the electrical contacts, add the tube damper, an play with the stabizing pucks

 The world works in mysterious ways. Apparently crushed minerals can siphon RF noise from cables. Anyone who says cables are all the same has proably never heard them on a revealing-enough system. I am looking forward to June. Thanks for listening. 

@davetherave11 why would tube dampers do anything for headphone listening? There is no sound from speakers to damp. Perhaps the power transformer adds vibration?

Thanks,

aldnorab 

aldnorab,

That is a very good question, and I  appreciate your raising it. The transformer for the LTA Z10 was removed from the Z10 and replaced by a larger transformer in a separate box attached to the smp via umbilical cord, so no noisy transformers to worry about. I guess I just thought that tubes could vibrate and smear the sound, but it never occurred to me to ask where the vibrations might be coming from. I think I will posr this question to my contact at LTA. If he nixes them, that's a nice chunk of change I could get back to put toward some other area of the system. I will report back.