@mclinnguy wrote "Follow your own advice in the first part to confirm the second part. It might very well be possible that you prefer N20 > BAT via AES, or perhaps N20 > BAT via USB over anything else via USB. And then the particular AES / USB cable selection might make the difference. "
RESPONSE: Of course, I agree with you on taking my own advice. I'm only saying that my research tell me that an AES optimized DAC will not allow the BAT to perform to its potential. I'm sure the N20 is great, it's just not the best for for the BAT because the BAT REX 3 DAC is a USB‑first, asynchronous DAC the DAC’s internal clock becomes the master clock and the N20's biggest engineering advantage (its clock) does not apply to USB. So, if I selected the N20 and connected using USB, then I've wasted money paying for technology (the N20's master clock) because the BAT's clock controls the audio stream.
Am I missing something?
@wsrrsw I'm aware of the Grimm. It was on my list early in my quest, but it's not optimized for USB which the Rex requires to perform its best. Grimm’s own documentation emphasizes that the MU1 is meant to feed a DAC via AES3. .and, no (lol), the Rex is going no where. Grimm, I understand, makes a great streamer but it's not optimal for my DAC. So, AES-optimized streamers are (after much reading) probably a non-starter for me. The more I read, my top choices are the Innuos Pulsar and the Rose RS130. I suspect that the Pulsar is the better choice, but I'm drawn to the RS130's big screen. We'll see what happens when I listen.. Still waiting for cables to come in the mail.
@marco1 Interesting to hear about your friend having problems with the RS130. You're not the first to tell me that. . .and, yes, I won't spend $38k on a streamer. I'd need to find something like that used. I'm patient and will wait for the right deal. AI scours the web for me daily looking for components on my list.

