LTA Aero vs Merason Reuss vs Mojo Audio Mystique Y?


Hi everyone, I just recently made an account after reading through @mitch2 ’s incredible Six Dac Comparison thread. I’m considering DAC upgrades from my Merason Frerot with Pow1 power supply, and the three finalists so far are the LTA Aero (I’d probably use the Ray Reserve tubes), Merason Reuss, and Mojo Audio Mystique Y (with either AM or NC chokes). Has anyone compared any of these three? I’m looking to retain the natural, "analog" liquidity of the Merason while improving upon microdynamics, depth, and imaging specificity.

Mitch had both the Aero and Mystique Y in-house, albeit not at the same time, so that gives me some sense of how they might compare using Aero’s stock tubes. Ideally I’d prefer to stay away from tubes but the Aero is pretty compelling. The only downside with the Mojo is that it’s optimized for its single-ended outputs and I’d want to use the balanced outputs for the best sonic performance from my amp. The Reuss would be a natural upgrade from my Frerot, but I’m not sure exactly how it compares to the more widely reviewed DAC1 MkII, and I also feel the AD1865 chip used in the LTA and Mojo is more well-regarded than the Burr Brown in the Merasons.

I’d appreciate any thoughts about how these three might compare for what I’m after. I’m very drawn to modern implementations of older DAC chips (specifically the AD1865, AD1862, Burr Brown PCM63, and other very well-regarded chips), so please let me know if there are any other DACs around the same price that I should be considering. This is for my desktop headphone system, so form factor is also important and the three DACs in the title are about as large as I’d like to go.

davebull

Thanks for your insights @mitch2 ! Your DAC comparison thread is a big reason I've landed on these three haha, so I really enjoy all your contributions that help people understand which DAC might work best for them.

My biggest reservation with the Mystique Y, aside from its aesthetics, is that Benjamin explained that Mojo Audio's DACs should, in theory, sound their best through their RCA outputs, whereas I want to use XLR outputs to make the most of my amp. However, in your thread I saw you actually preferred the XLR outputs of the Mystique Y and found it sounded more vibrant and dynamic, which is an important aspect of sound to me. Benjamin also said the "better" output mostly comes down to preferences, so maybe I shouldn't be concerned about not getting the most out of the Mystique if I were to use its XLR outputs.

The hardness you found with the Aero seems to be avoidable with a tube roll. As you pointed out in your thread, 

Regarding the chokes in the Mojo Audio DACs, you posted the following written by AI:

From AI:

The core material affects how the power supply delivers current, which in turn influences the sonic presentation.

  • Ferrous Core (Entry Level): This core provides more "gestalt and slam" to the sound, with a more energetic and exciting presentation. It has a robust, impactful sound, though some reviewers note it can be slightly less subtle or textured compared to the higher tiers.
  • Amorphous Core (Upgrade): The amorphous core provides an intermediate step, offering more micro-details, micro-dynamics, and a more pronounced texture than the ferrous core. The sound has a slightly lower sine wave energy representation (per Mojo Audio’s analogy), which translates to more nuances and more refined textures in the audio reproduction.
  • Nanocrystal Core (Top Tier): This is the top-of-the-line option and offers the greatest refinement. The nanocrystal core provides the most profound sound quality, with a very low noise floor that allows for subtle and complex harmonic details to become apparent. The sound is more relaxed, with better timing, tune, harmonic structure, and overall musical flow, leading to more engaging emotional expression. It provides the best resolution and the most natural timbre, bringing the listener closer to an analog, vinyl-like experience.

In summary, as you move from ferrous to amorphous to nanocrystal cores, the sound signature becomes less "digital" and more organic, with increased resolution, better harmonic coherence, and a more natural, emotionally engaging presentation. The fundamental energy remains the same, but it is delivered with greater texture and nuance with the advanced core materials.

Do you have any additional thoughts from your own listening experiences regarding the relative strengths of the AM and NC chokes and what preferences might lead to someone liking the AM chokes more?

Thanks again!

@davebull 

FYI, Choice Audio has a demo Reuss. The owner (I forget his name) offered to send it to me for a home demo. I decided not to, after reading reviews of the Reuss, but I expect you could approach him.  

https://choiceaudio.com/products/merason-reuss-dac-trade-in-model

As far as the Merason DAC 1 MK 2 on TMR goes, keep in mind that you will pay a 5% restock fee plus shipping for the privilege of auditioning it. 

https://tmraudio.com/fresh-arrivals/merason-dac1-mkii-d-a-converter/?searchid=1946918&search_query=merason

 

Regarding chokes, I am not sure I could reliable describe the sonic differences between them.  My progression thorough the Mojo Audio line-up included all of the different chokes but each change also came with a component upgrade so the changes I heard were not from the chokes alone.  The last three Mojo Audio DACs I had here each included the NC chokes and each of them sounded great.   The Mystique Y I had here for review had the AM chokes and it also sounded very nice.  

I suggest relying on Benjamin’s descriptions of the chokes and the sonic signature of each, but I wouldn’t consider the difference between AM and NC chokes alone as a make or break proposition.  One of my favorite Mojo Audio DACs, the EVO PRO that I previously owned, had AM chokes.

@davebull if you do end up trying the LTA Aero, let me echo some of part 2 of Michael Lavorgna’s review where he gets into some tube rolling, that you referred to earlier.  (Link here for others’ convenience:

https://twitteringmachines.com/review-linear-tube-audio-aero-dac-part-2-tube-rolling/ )

I love the Aero (i own 2), and i have not compared the stock GE tubes to Ray Selects or Reserves, but the sound difference from the the stock tubes to the Tung Sol oval plates is really stunning.  I think the Aero sounds very nice  with the stock tubes, but I understand why some people report a certain thinness or hardness. With the NOS Tung Sol ovals, that all is gone and one gets complete, lit from within sonic’s from low to high frequencies (at least with my speakers in the 2 systems where Aeros are providing the D to A conversions).  I’m sure that @mitch2 ’s Helene sounds better — and if i ever figure out a listening space that can be acoustically treated, I’d love to give the Kassandra II or the Helene and maybe even more resolving speakers a home trial — but keeping within your described size and budget considerations, not to say that the Mojo or the Mearason wouldn’t also be as good or even better, the Aero with Tung Sol ovals will not disappoint you.