Tekton Double Impact SE vs Kef R7 Meta
Hello everyone, I’m looking for some help with my eventual upgrade path. I currently have a pair of Kef Q350 being powered by a Willsenton R8. I enjoy the clarity, detail, and instrument separation of the Kef’s, but they can be a bit polite. Soundstage is great as well, tonal balance is good as well. I’ve been looking at the R7 metas figuring they have similar sound characteristics as the Q350s just with more refinement and overall better sound, but I realize the Willsenton might be a bit underpowered (especially in triode mode) to really make them sing. Tekton is a name that keeps coming up in my research. I realize they can be a bit of a controversial choice do to some of the issues they’ve had with reviewers. All I really am concerned with is, how do they actually sound. I really want to keep that clarity that the KEFs have. We listen primarily to rock, metal, and electronic music. My room is rather large. It’s a 19’x 39’ great room (living room, dining room, and kitchen.
I’d like to hear from people that have had experience with either of these speakers with similar amplification and what their thoughts are. I’m also open to other speaker suggestions. Thank you!
- ...
- 85 posts total
I'm currently using a Rotel RA-6000 right now, but Ive driven them with a Primaluna EVO 400 for quite some time. KT150's putting out 70 W/Ch they were simply incredible. I first drove them with a Krell KAV 3250, three channels with a Moab center, which I still have, until I got the tube bug. I'm going to get another pair after we do our final move, perhaps before if my wife permits, and yes, she's okay with them as long as she can choose the color. Already talking with Eric about it. |
Until relatively recently, i had a Schweikert VR55 (60k, 70k, whatever). A used pair of Moabs (curiosity purchase) killed that Schweikert, tarred and feathered. I sold it in a hurry. Guy I know has a Alexx V (130k). I audited it extensively, took my own front end electronics...not a chance,.... you could give me a Alexxa V for free, I'd sell it immediately and keep the Moab. I run it with some high end electronics however, which cost magnitudes more than the speaker...they are well deserved in this case. The tekton guy has cracked some code, sitting over there in the middle of nowhere Utah desert.... preserving harmonics that were long gone with the Alexx foolishness and a whole lotta crap out there.. These apparently 'high end' speaker dudes have cracked no code or innovated, but, they can put an extra shine and finish on the cabinet., call it material B, material S, material BS, etc. @jijoh123 wrote
|
| Post removed |
I wholeheartedly agree with Deep that Wilson Audio is pretentious, aspirational, and grotesquely overpriced trash. But all that Tekton praise? That’s a bridge too far for me. Granted, I was biased from the start because of the owner’s notorious penchant for acting like an [insert synonyms for donkey and cavity]; this is the guy who went on a crusade against ASR for calling out his speakers to sound like trash, arguing that ASR should have inserted the spikes before testing but did not, thereby causing the issue. Really. Then of course he threatened legal action, thoroughly ridiculing himself in the process. For that reason alone, I will never own tekton speakers, or DCS or Tom Evans anything for that matter. Now, if you told me that $12K pro speakers leave $50K Wilson speakers in the dust I would be totally willing to entertain that notion, because more than likely you would be right. But tektons? Their enclosures are plain-jane, rectangular, ported monkey coffins. Drivers are budget junk. Crossovers? Who knows. The only obvious differentiator is the sheer number of drivers (picture tekton owner conjuring dead Kabuki speakers’ spirits during late-night séance). I think there might be Moabs for sale locally. Maybe I should go take a listen. Just for the sake of dotting Is and crossing Ts |
- 85 posts total

