@mahler123 wrote "I know this is the analog section but why not use a digital tuner for AM? The Fidelity isn’t going to be great no matter what you do because of the source."
If you’re asking why I didn’t select a tuner with as digital display in favor of an analog display, then first, I would ask you Why would you not want an analog display?
Second, Fidelity, is not the sole reason for my selection. If it was, I'd've selected one of the other tuners that I considered that offer better AM performance. According to what I’ve read, the Marantz 2130 was the manufacturer’s "flagship tuner in it’s day and it continues to be a strong performer with exceptional multipath handling." So, it satisfies my fidelity requirement for AM radio.
Third, then, (my real reason) is that there’s the absolute cool factor with its built-in oscilioscope providing for exceptional multipath handling plus the tactile experience that comes when using the tuning dial. . . and, for me, there’s a sense of nostalgia that comes with owning equipment like this (which is why I believe it’s one of the most collectible solid-state tuners ever made and significantly rarer that most Marantz models.)
I remember when digital displays were introduced during the 70s. We all thought it was so cool and futuristic. Today, digital displays are just numbers without the flair and styling that comes with the classic look. (This also explains why I bought a turntable, reel-to-reel deck, and even a tuner in a time when all that content--and more--can be heard on a streamer.
We’re more than ones and zeros and I want more than a digital experience.

