Dang it… cables do matter (at least in my system)


I really didn’t want to write this post.

Like many of you, I am not a cable guy. I would much rather believe that a well-made, sensibly priced cable gets you 99% of the way there and that anything beyond that is mostly jewelry for audiophiles. In fact, that belief is exactly why I started this experiment in the first place.

I recently picked up a higher-end phono cable (Nordost Heimdall 2) to compare against a Blue Jeans Cable I already owned and respected. My intention—honestly—was to scratch the curiosity itch, confirm that the cheaper cable sounded just as good in my system, and then send the expensive one back with my wallet intact and my worldview reinforced.

That… did not happen.

In my system, the pricier cable consistently sounded better. Not “night and day,” not “jaw on the floor,” but unmistakably better: wider and more coherent soundstage, stronger and more articulate bass, better placement of instruments, more air around them, and a more resolved top end that wasn’t brighter or etched. Just clearer. More sorted. More believable.

Still, I was fully prepared to chalk some of that up to expectation bias. After all, I knew which cable was which, and $1,200 has a way of whispering sweet nothings into your ears.

So tonight, during a dinner party, I did something unplanned. I had four people listen—my brother (a dyed-in-the-wool non-audiophile), my daughter (a budding audiophile), my sister-in-law (a musician), and my wife. I didn’t tell them which cable was which, only that they were two different phono cables at very different price points and that I was trying to decide between them.

All four, independently and without hesitation, preferred the same cable. Not subtly. Not with hedging. My brother—who could not care less about hi-fi and would happily listen through a Bluetooth speaker—said there was “no question” which one he liked and that he wouldn’t use the other if given the choice.

Cue my quiet sigh.

So yes, to my chagrin and to the detriment of my wallet, the more expensive cable outperformed the cheaper one in my system. I wish the Blue Jeans had won. I truly do. This would have been a much cheaper and more philosophically satisfying outcome.

I’m not claiming cables transform systems, nor that everyone needs to run out and spend real money on them. I’m also not suggesting this will translate universally. But in this case—same system, same music, multiple listeners—the difference was real enough that even the skeptics in the room heard it.

I remain annoyed.
But apparently… cables do matter. Somewhat.

Dang it

brighamdoc

seymour-krelborn

Outstanding! Selecting the Sky interconnect is not a bad place to start. During my auditions, I found Sky, to match very nicely with Volcano speaker cables. Yes, these are older AQ models that still hold up well today.  

What other cables/cords and gear is in your System?

Happy Listening!

In sound everything matters. Magnitude of change is not really that important with most human beings. We are still animals in that the slightest change in our sound environment immediately gets our attention. Sometimes it's the faintest difference that most gets our attention.

very expensive cables are made for folks who can hear the difference: the wealthy

wink

@parkergetdean 

very expensive cables are made for folks who can hear the difference: the wealthy

Price does not dictate quality.  There is no shortage of expensive gear that does not sound very good.

If I purchase a Home Depot cable for $10, and I manage to sell it on eBay for $1,000, that does not make that expensive cable any better.

Better equipment / higher quality equipment will generally be more expensive.  That goes for just about any products under the sun.  But the price, alone, does not dictate quality.

laugh

@seymour-krelborn I agree. My comment was about confirmation bias. If you buy it, you want to justify it. (Can you send me a link to the $1000 ebay home depot cable, I am interested?)