"These are the most salient remarks of any passage posted in this thread since I’ve been following it."
Did you completely ignore this?^
Dealing with Static on LP palyback
Anyone have any suggestions on how to deal with static build up on LPs as I play them? Just playing one side is something enough to cause an arc when I pick up the album. Most of the time I hear tiny, consistent crackles that sound just like static.
All the things I tried that claim to reduce static does not. I must have four record mats and a camel hair tone arm brush, all of which claim to reduce static but have no effect that I can see.
I am bowing out of this discussion, as my views and experience have already been stated. However, Richard, I gotta say that your notion that an "electron" can be trapped in a dust particle (or whatever you want to call it) along with a positively charged ion and yet still exert a deleterious effect due to its negative charge, even though neutralized by the nearby positively charged ion and thereby evading detection by an ES charge meter, is untenable. ES charge is measured in Volts. If there are no volts measured, there is no net negative charge (negative in this case, at least) and there is therefore no effect of ES charge in the neighborhood. You insinuated that I detected no charge after playing an LP, because my meter is "cheap". But it does detect thousands of volts of charge when I yank an LP from its paper sleeve, with predictable regularity. And it does detect the dissipation of that charge when I subsequently treat that LP with my Zerostat (following the classical directions of how to use a Zerostat), so what does it matter if it’s cheap? And how do you define cheap? If I told you I used a $200 ruler to measure the diameter of an LP, you might say that was a very expensive ruler. Many others use a comb and a piece of toilet paper to detect ES charge. Now THAT is cheap. As you noted, and I do agree, there is much that we do not yet understand about ES force. It's quite a fascinating subject, actually. So is the question of what is an electron, really? |
I think you characterised your charge meter as cheap, whether you meant to or not:
I have never said an electron is trapped in a dust particle - quite the opposite. The dust particle has to carry a positive charge - many do. Then that dust particle is strongly attracted to a dislodged electron stuck to the surface of the vinyl. Your own initial measurement showed an increase in negative charge on the vinyl after playing with a diamond stylus, but the subsequent readings were ambiguous. Look at the laboratory apparatus used to measure charge transfer in the papers referenced by @antinn and you will see why your meter is good for measuring kiloVolts but not much else. You obviously made your mind up that there is little to no triboelectric effect with the vinyl / diamond pairing, and deduced without evidence that diamond and vinyl must be almost identical from a triboelectric perspective. Lack of data on pure diamond probably flows from the difficulty and cost of getting a decent size lump of the natural stuff. The reality is the exact opposite according, to ChatGPT
For the record (no pun intended) the exact question I posed was
:
|
Admittedly this will read as snarky but its not meant to be. Having been frustrated with the expense and tedium of vinyl myself, my advice is to cut your losses on vinyl and go back to streaming, no one will convince me vinyl’s a better all around experience. It's nostalgic - for a while- then the realities of its drawback and limitations set in. |