Take it on faith: A cease-and-desist letter to those who only believe in measurements


Faith is a firm belief in something for which there is no proof (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith). Faith is often considered to be distinct from and even contrary to science. I argue science is based on faith. Specifically, it is faith in the belief that measurements are always correct, and they alone can reveal the world around us. However, there is no evidence that this approach will always provide a correct and complete depiction of our environment.

I am not anti-science. In fact, I am all about science. I was a science major in college. I taught high school biology and chemistry. I employ science every day in my current career. I also use it to make decisions when it comes to audio, and I can point to a scientific basis behind my equipment decisions, speaker/listener locations and room treatment. I believe John Locke’s scientific method is a wonderful boon to mankind.  But although data may rule my life, I know that science has its limitations.

The scientific method is an empirical approach and relies on our eight senses or extensions thereof to measure phenomena, enabling us to better understand and control our environment. People who embrace this approach believe if something cannot be measured, it cannot exist. They have total faith in this approach and deny the credibility of others whose senses do not or cannot yield something in units. In essence, these disciples take it on faith that measurements are the only true way to make sense of the world. However, we just may not have developed the instrument that enables us to measure the event. Early digital is a good example of our senses superseding the limitations of our understanding of the technology and hence, our measurements. Other examples of this include our past beliefs that we could destroy mass, that the earth is flat, and the universe is not expanding. And cables and amplifiers all sound the same.

Others find their senses can reveal events that are not apparent to some and may not even be measurable. Some people can smell faint odors or feel a slight breeze that others cannot.  My wife can find a Petoskey stone on a beach out of thousands of rocks; I cannot see it even when I am standing over it. Different cables, fuses, amplifier topology, or cartridge design may or may not result in the same or even any data points and may or may not sound alike. But just because you cannot hear a difference nor measure a difference does not mean there is no difference. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, just as good sound may be in their ear.

Some of us have at least as much faith in our ears as we do in our REW software and associated hardware. I start room setup with acoustic theory and then confirm with measurements, but the final placement is always a result of what sounds most pleasing. I would not know how to determine speaker toe-in using a microphone.

While I will always have to trust my senses, I am not handicapped by relying solely on those that are associated with a number.

 “…not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” William Bruce Cameron, 1963

tcutter

I prefer the word "optimization" to the word "tweak" because the substantive "tweak" refer  most of the time in audio threads to device you can buy as a Shumann generator like the one i used also and use them as "tweak"... You buy a device ...

But mechanical,electrical,acoustical and DSP optimization ask not just for buying a device as solution but to create a process of feed back between listening and tuning  using your ears with homemade devices  also as an Helmholtz resonators or any other devices which nmodify the acoustic content or the vibrating geometry of a room  and not just  ready made devices.

What matter is the process of hearing when a modification is introduced not buying a device .But to hear something we must learn how to recobnize it ...

Some sell "tweaking" device at high price but they dont sell optimization as a process or acoustics books, because without basic concepts our brain cannot process what enter the ears lacking the necessary concept..

 

We cannot perceive as meaningful a phenomenon unknown with no corresponding concepts... Any sound convey  many information load we must learn to decipher ...

A child must learn how to distinguish the sound of a wooden resonating sphere, a metal sphere vibrating, and the differences between spheres with one hole in the center or with many hole around it  etc ...

 

 «My girl tapping a banana from the market is an acoustician ?»--Groucho Marx in lovecool

Audio aficionados have at least 60 years of observational data, cross-referenced, using numerous speakers and equipment during their lives to confirm there is something wrong with the recordings. It is absolutely right to make adjustments. Room corrected flat is scientifically wrong for the ears because it does not factor the data from the recordings. Any other type of measurement is also only partial data points. Measurement marketing has really been abused.

How about a cease and desist on people who claim to be audiophiles, but then turn around and claim expensive power cables and fancy speaker wires change sound.

“Measurement marketing has really been abused.”

@bartsw - Agree, as has subjective observation marketing!