Interpretation

I discovered  Beethoven piano concerto with him and i dont mind the sound i hear the soul...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAfCW2-3NxA

Nothing beat Furtwangler direction  very often...

In the history of  remote viewing a soul with music Furtwangler reading of the 4th of Schumann is unsurpassed, i pity those who listen "sound" not music : 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9t5I7PYh_EU&list=RD9t5I7PYh_EU&start_radio=1

 Probably one of the greatest interpretation of music i know.... Who care about the sound which remastered anyway is "good" ...

 Audiophilia  hiding  musical genius is an impediment ....

It is like marrying a beautifully artificially enhanced woman body ....

 Anyway i dont hear  "sound"  after my system optimization was completed, i hear music ...All recordings appear as they are some better some worst, but music like a spiritual woman is beautiful in spite of being dressed in rags ....

Who cares about the "sound" here need a new heart not a new system : 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cv_wV7H-JU&list=RD4cv_wV7H-JU&start_radio=1

RV…In general….I would not consider “Modern Sound” to be better sound than recordings put on tape in the 60s/70s/80s

I’m afraid that for some time I’ve been seduced by SQ  to the point that it has taken me time to get back to my position as a music lover and musician.  I’m slowly recovering but still put too much emphasis on sound. However, I really treasure great classic recordings regardless of SQ.

@chrisoshea 

i agree with you regarding the wonderful iconic pre-Dolby recordings of the 50’s and early 60’s. After that though, it’s hit and miss.