Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

First: i cannot judge from youtube ...

Second: It is a common place fact in small room acoustics that we tune our room from the listening chair position...

Third:  I am with you for the brain work over price, but acoustics of small room using mechanical devices and /or DSP and psycho-acoustics  is fundamental not a cherry on the cake of well done gear design sorry. 

it is the only thing i learned as audiophile...

In any small room the sound perception at the listening position is conditioned by basic acoustics knowledge. Design matter but less than acoustics. I can use a low cost System with optimizing astounding result in a room designed acoustically for it, but i cannot do anything with a high end system in a bad room (most uncontrolled room are not ideal to some degree ) 

By the way i may use A.I. for speech clarity, but this fact i learned it myself in a two years tuning process with a grid of  100 Helmholtz resonators  specifically located.(and other tweaks rooted in acoustics principles )

I dont need a doctorate to understand basics...

smiley

 

Merry christmas to all audiogon friends...

I wish a good health to all ...

And an imprevisible gift for you  from God... 

 

@mahgister your assessment of the two audio recordings parallels mine. The reason that I wanted you to listen to this comparison, which I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that I would post, is that this demonstrates that the only thing that matters in the end and that should be judged is the composite resultant sound at the listening chair position. 

 

 

I have a cousin who grows singing birds. They are all born in the 'captivity' but there are some that are caught alive in the 'wild', all in pursue of some 'melody' that they are supposed to sing. Also, he breeds the wild ones with 'domestic' ones in a hope that those will 'perform' even better than any of those two sorts could. The problem is that 'melody' that they are supposed to sing exist only in minds and heads of the group that are occupied with that mutual passion. It is almost a mythical song, that some of them have heard, somewhere, sometimes but can only be described with words and not by actual living proof of a bird or better, bird song. Sometimes, some of them are lucky enough to grow, catch or have a bird, that has a song that is 'close' to that mythical one, that all are talking or dreaming about. When this happens and if it acknowledged by others from that group, that bird becomes very valuable and many try to record the singing of that bird to use it as a model from which the other birds, should learn how to sing. Reason behind it is because birds can be taught how to sing, if kept in a place where they can not heard any other melody from the time they go out from the egg. Needless to say, they are always arguing how 'close' to that 'mythical' singing, some other bird is. My cousin even bought very respectful hi fi system on which he plays music, meaning some particular bird song, only to his birds. He even took some recorded 'songs' and paid professional studio remastering for it, just to have better recording that he can play to his birds. As far as I know, they are still chasing that mythical bird, meaning, the song...and still bitterly arguing about it. Any similarity to some of the 'conversation' above is purely accidental...

Post removed 

@josepad 

High resolution gives me a high level of musicality. 

A highly resolving amp and speaker system reveals the inherent musicality or lack thereof in the source.