Take it on faith: A cease-and-desist letter to those who only believe in measurements


Faith is a firm belief in something for which there is no proof (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith). Faith is often considered to be distinct from and even contrary to science. I argue science is based on faith. Specifically, it is faith in the belief that measurements are always correct, and they alone can reveal the world around us. However, there is no evidence that this approach will always provide a correct and complete depiction of our environment.

I am not anti-science. In fact, I am all about science. I was a science major in college. I taught high school biology and chemistry. I employ science every day in my current career. I also use it to make decisions when it comes to audio, and I can point to a scientific basis behind my equipment decisions, speaker/listener locations and room treatment. I believe John Locke’s scientific method is a wonderful boon to mankind.  But although data may rule my life, I know that science has its limitations.

The scientific method is an empirical approach and relies on our eight senses or extensions thereof to measure phenomena, enabling us to better understand and control our environment. People who embrace this approach believe if something cannot be measured, it cannot exist. They have total faith in this approach and deny the credibility of others whose senses do not or cannot yield something in units. In essence, these disciples take it on faith that measurements are the only true way to make sense of the world. However, we just may not have developed the instrument that enables us to measure the event. Early digital is a good example of our senses superseding the limitations of our understanding of the technology and hence, our measurements. Other examples of this include our past beliefs that we could destroy mass, that the earth is flat, and the universe is not expanding. And cables and amplifiers all sound the same.

Others find their senses can reveal events that are not apparent to some and may not even be measurable. Some people can smell faint odors or feel a slight breeze that others cannot.  My wife can find a Petoskey stone on a beach out of thousands of rocks; I cannot see it even when I am standing over it. Different cables, fuses, amplifier topology, or cartridge design may or may not result in the same or even any data points and may or may not sound alike. But just because you cannot hear a difference nor measure a difference does not mean there is no difference. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, just as good sound may be in their ear.

Some of us have at least as much faith in our ears as we do in our REW software and associated hardware. I start room setup with acoustic theory and then confirm with measurements, but the final placement is always a result of what sounds most pleasing. I would not know how to determine speaker toe-in using a microphone.

While I will always have to trust my senses, I am not handicapped by relying solely on those that are associated with a number.

 “…not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” William Bruce Cameron, 1963

tcutter

Didn't Goethe say: "he who possesses science and art has religion; but he who possesses neither, let him have religion", something like that.  Read that quote, I thought in Faust a long time ago in college.  And aren't there theories that propose consciousness might be a particle in a quantum state, part of matter itself?  Anyhoo, if you don't like what someone said or thinks and it doesn't personally affect you, ignore them or it.  Life's too short.

  •  

For those who want to understand what is science but do not have the time to understand how Goethe method can reveal our own reality (Henri Bortoft book) if "we takes appearances seriously" in a way technology could not, then we must listen to : 

Bas van Fraassen: Why Science Doesn’t Reveal Reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhpRAWxvY5s&t=3s

 

 

OP, there is a basic error in your statement below:

“I argue science is based on faith. Specifically, it is faith in the belief that measurements are always correct, and they alone can reveal the world around us.”

‘The scientific method (SM) never posits that measurements are always correct. SM offers a hypothesis, supporting evidence (data, simulation results) and then invites the world to confirm or reject the hypothesis. Scientists are wrong all the time. And the explanations that are currently accepted as scientific ‘truth’ may be laughed at in 25 years. But SM is the best approach humans have devised to proceed along the path from ignorance to understanding of our physical world. 
 

Audio measurement is not always the answer to evaluating sound quality. Careful A-B comparison, though not perfect, will likely produce the most objective results.

I’ll offer a different definition of faith- it’s the choice not to seek the truth.

Audio device cannot be designed/manufactured/fixed w/o science/engineering/testing components/measurements. 

I’ll offer a different definition of faith- it’s the choice not to seek the truth.

 

Faith is not belief it may imply belief or not...

It is an impulse  and the energy to act...A trust revealing our potential....

 Someone who do not need to seek truth because he believe he own it, can be a "scientist" or a religious zealot, ideologues are ideologues they use beliefs and programation as a weapon or as tool...

Science as say Bas Van Fraassen "does not reveal reality" but gives us limited models:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhpRAWxvY5s&t=3s

Goethe explain his scientific method how to takes appearences seriously and transform ourselves doing so... But it is another story...